A Systematic Review of Research on Guided Access Cavity Preparation Endodontic Treatment: Dentin Preservation Perspectives.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S491632
Anna Muryani, Dudi Aripin, Hendra Dian Adhita Dharsono, Zainul Ahmad Rajion, Satrio Wicaksono
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Research on Guided Access Cavity Preparation Endodontic Treatment: Dentin Preservation Perspectives.","authors":"Anna Muryani, Dudi Aripin, Hendra Dian Adhita Dharsono, Zainul Ahmad Rajion, Satrio Wicaksono","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S491632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guided access cavity preparation (GACP) is an endodontic procedure utilizing stents, guide sleeves, or dynamic guides to facilitate the proper formation of access cavities. This paper aims to evaluate the significance of research on guided access cavity preparation in endodontic treatment concerning dentin preservation. In the context of dentin preservation, this paper provides a thorough scoping review of a variety of methodologies for evaluating the accuracy of guided access cavity preparation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Article searches were conducted using Tthe keywords \"Guide Access Cavity Preparation\" AND \"Static Guide OR 3D Printing Template\" AND \"Dynamic Guide through digital databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Research articles published in English within the past five years (2019-2024) and in accordance with the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework were also included in the study. Articles from the meta-analysis or systematic review study type, those that were not accessible in full text or in a paid format, and those that did not assess the use of guided endodontics in endodontic surgery were excluded. This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 articles were reviewed, encompassing various locations, designs, type, and samples, which demonstrated the use of guided access cavity preparation has significant clinical applications and can provide accurate results in endodontic therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Article searches were conducted using the keywords \"Guide Access Cavity Preparation\" AND 'Static Guide OR 3D Printing Template' AND\" Dynamic Guide through digital databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Research articles published in English within the past five years (2019-2024) and in accordance with the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework were also included in the study. Articles from the meta-analysis or systematic review study type, those that were not accessible in full text or in a paid format, and those that did not assess the use of guided endodontics in endodontic surgery were excluded. This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria. Studies show that advanced technologies in guided access cavity preparation endodontic treatment can improve dentin preservation, improve accuracy and predictability, particularly for root canal anomalies and difficult teeth, but clinicians must consider limitations and clinical applications. Clinicians must evaluate the limitations and clinical applications of guided endodontic access prior to its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":"17 ","pages":"49-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S491632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Guided access cavity preparation (GACP) is an endodontic procedure utilizing stents, guide sleeves, or dynamic guides to facilitate the proper formation of access cavities. This paper aims to evaluate the significance of research on guided access cavity preparation in endodontic treatment concerning dentin preservation. In the context of dentin preservation, this paper provides a thorough scoping review of a variety of methodologies for evaluating the accuracy of guided access cavity preparation.

Materials and methods: Article searches were conducted using Tthe keywords "Guide Access Cavity Preparation" AND "Static Guide OR 3D Printing Template" AND "Dynamic Guide through digital databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Research articles published in English within the past five years (2019-2024) and in accordance with the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework were also included in the study. Articles from the meta-analysis or systematic review study type, those that were not accessible in full text or in a paid format, and those that did not assess the use of guided endodontics in endodontic surgery were excluded. This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria.

Results: A total of 12 articles were reviewed, encompassing various locations, designs, type, and samples, which demonstrated the use of guided access cavity preparation has significant clinical applications and can provide accurate results in endodontic therapy.

Conclusion: Article searches were conducted using the keywords "Guide Access Cavity Preparation" AND 'Static Guide OR 3D Printing Template' AND" Dynamic Guide through digital databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Research articles published in English within the past five years (2019-2024) and in accordance with the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework were also included in the study. Articles from the meta-analysis or systematic review study type, those that were not accessible in full text or in a paid format, and those that did not assess the use of guided endodontics in endodontic surgery were excluded. This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria. Studies show that advanced technologies in guided access cavity preparation endodontic treatment can improve dentin preservation, improve accuracy and predictability, particularly for root canal anomalies and difficult teeth, but clinicians must consider limitations and clinical applications. Clinicians must evaluate the limitations and clinical applications of guided endodontic access prior to its implementation.

目的:引导通路龋洞预备(GACP)是一种牙髓治疗过程,它利用支架、引导套筒或动态导向器来促进通路龋洞的正确形成。本文旨在评估牙髓治疗中关于牙本质保存的引导通路洞预备研究的意义。在牙本质保存的背景下,本文对用于评估引导通路龋洞制备准确性的各种方法进行了全面的综述:通过数字数据库(包括 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Science Direct 和 Google Scholar),使用关键字 "引导式龋洞预备"、"静态引导或 3D 打印模板 "和 "动态引导 "进行文章检索。本研究还纳入了过去五年(2019-2024 年)内发表的符合 PCC(人口、概念和语境)框架的英文研究文章。荟萃分析或系统综述研究类型的文章、无法获取全文或付费格式的文章以及未评估牙髓手术中引导式根管治疗的文章均被排除在外。本范围界定综述遵循了范围界定综述的无Meta分析系统综述扩展首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)标准:结果:共审查了 12 篇文章,涵盖了不同的地点、设计、类型和样本,这些文章证明了使用引导通路牙洞预备具有重要的临床应用价值,并能在牙髓治疗中提供准确的结果:通过PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Science Direct和Google Scholar等数字数据库,使用关键词 "引导入洞制备"、"静态引导或3D打印模板 "和 "动态引导 "对文章进行了检索。本研究还纳入了过去五年(2019-2024 年)内发表的符合 PCC(人口、概念和语境)框架的英文研究文章。荟萃分析或系统综述研究类型的文章、无法获取全文或付费格式的文章以及未评估牙髓手术中引导式根管治疗的文章均被排除在外。本范围界定综述遵循了范围界定综述的无荟萃分析系统综述首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)标准。研究表明,引导通路龋洞预备牙髓治疗中的先进技术可以改善牙本质保存、提高准确性和可预测性,尤其是对于根管异常和疑难牙,但临床医生必须考虑其局限性和临床应用。临床医生在实施引导下进入根管治疗前必须评估其局限性和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信