Residual Mitral Regurgitation Interacts With Transmitral Mean Pressure Gradient to Modify the Association With Mortality Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Neal M Duggal, Milo Engoren, Paul Sorajja, D Scott Lim, Jason H Rogers, Scott M Chadderdon, Firas E Zahr, Evelio Rodriguez, M Andrew Morse, Enrique Garcia-Sayan, Nishtha Sodhi, Marcella A Calfon Press, Gorav Ailawadi
{"title":"Residual Mitral Regurgitation Interacts With Transmitral Mean Pressure Gradient to Modify the Association With Mortality Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.","authors":"Neal M Duggal, Milo Engoren, Paul Sorajja, D Scott Lim, Jason H Rogers, Scott M Chadderdon, Firas E Zahr, Evelio Rodriguez, M Andrew Morse, Enrique Garcia-Sayan, Nishtha Sodhi, Marcella A Calfon Press, Gorav Ailawadi","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association, if any, between the transmitral mean pressure gradient (TMPG) after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and 1-year mortality is controversial in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip system. We sought to estimate the association between intraoperatively measured residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) and TMPG and 1-year mortality among patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair to facilitate decisions on additional devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In patients with severe secondary (functional) MR, we analyzed registry data using generalized estimating equations. Both rMR and TMPG were nonlinearly transformed using fractional polynomials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 570 patients with secondary MR who underwent mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in 11 centers. Most patients were men (61%) and averaged 72±12 years of age. Most (78%) patients had TMPG <5 mm Hg and 22% had TMPG ≥5 mm Hg. Postprocedural MR severity improved substantially, being ≤2+ in 95% (with ≤1+ in 76%), 3+ in 3%, and 4+ in 2%. 1-year mortality was 20%. After adjustment for confounders, rMR (odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.88-2.35]; <i>P</i><0.001 for rMR<sup>.5</sup>) and TMPG remained associated with mortality, with odds ratios of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.19-1.32), 1.84 (1.58-2.10), and 3.13 (2.31-3.98) for TMPG values of 4, 6, and 8, respectively, compared with TMPG=2 mm Hg at rMR=1+.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both rMR and TMPG were nonlinearly associated with 1-year mortality. At low levels of rMR, changes in TMPG are associated with only small changes in the risk of death. Conversely, at higher levels of rMR, even small changes in TMPG are associated with larger changes in the absolute risk of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014843"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association, if any, between the transmitral mean pressure gradient (TMPG) after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and 1-year mortality is controversial in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip system. We sought to estimate the association between intraoperatively measured residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) and TMPG and 1-year mortality among patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair to facilitate decisions on additional devices.

Methods: In patients with severe secondary (functional) MR, we analyzed registry data using generalized estimating equations. Both rMR and TMPG were nonlinearly transformed using fractional polynomials.

Results: We studied 570 patients with secondary MR who underwent mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in 11 centers. Most patients were men (61%) and averaged 72±12 years of age. Most (78%) patients had TMPG <5 mm Hg and 22% had TMPG ≥5 mm Hg. Postprocedural MR severity improved substantially, being ≤2+ in 95% (with ≤1+ in 76%), 3+ in 3%, and 4+ in 2%. 1-year mortality was 20%. After adjustment for confounders, rMR (odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.88-2.35]; P<0.001 for rMR.5) and TMPG remained associated with mortality, with odds ratios of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.19-1.32), 1.84 (1.58-2.10), and 3.13 (2.31-3.98) for TMPG values of 4, 6, and 8, respectively, compared with TMPG=2 mm Hg at rMR=1+.

Conclusions: Both rMR and TMPG were nonlinearly associated with 1-year mortality. At low levels of rMR, changes in TMPG are associated with only small changes in the risk of death. Conversely, at higher levels of rMR, even small changes in TMPG are associated with larger changes in the absolute risk of death.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信