Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 1621 critically ill neonatal foals (2005-2022).

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
J A Flood, N M Collins, C M Russell, R S Cuming, J B Carrick, L A Cudmore
{"title":"Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 1621 critically ill neonatal foals (2005-2022).","authors":"J A Flood, N M Collins, C M Russell, R S Cuming, J B Carrick, L A Cudmore","doi":"10.1111/avj.13423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal foals. Administration of appropriate antimicrobials and early aggressive supportive treatment is central to the efficacious treatment of neonatal sepsis and has proven to positively influence outcomes. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate microorganism results and antimicrobial sensitivities of neonatal foals with a positive blood culture submitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) during 2005-2022. The secondary aim was to compare the results to those of a similar previous study performed at the same ICU during 1999-2004.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of bacterial blood culture results from neonatal foals ≤7 days of age admitted to Scone Equine Hospital between 2005 and 2022 was analysed. Samples were collected at admission. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Susceptibility results from the two study periods were compared using Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was achieved at P value <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1621 blood cultures submitted, 380 returned a positive result (380/1621; 23.4%). A total of 402 bacterial isolates were recovered: 55.5% Gram-positive isolates (223/402), 42.6% Gram-negative isolates (171/402) and 1.7% anaerobic isolates (7/409). A significant increase in Gram-positive isolates between time periods was observed (P = 0.002). Gram-negative isolates had significant increases of resistance in seven out of nine antimicrobials tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides Australian veterinarians with information on common bacterial pathogens in critically ill neonatal foals to assist with making informed empirical antimicrobial choices to optimise treatment efficacy. Increases in bacterial resistance to commonly administered antimicrobials were observed; therefore, culture and sensitivity testing should guide antimicrobial choices. Judicious use of antimicrobials in equine practice is imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal foals. Administration of appropriate antimicrobials and early aggressive supportive treatment is central to the efficacious treatment of neonatal sepsis and has proven to positively influence outcomes. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate microorganism results and antimicrobial sensitivities of neonatal foals with a positive blood culture submitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) during 2005-2022. The secondary aim was to compare the results to those of a similar previous study performed at the same ICU during 1999-2004.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of bacterial blood culture results from neonatal foals ≤7 days of age admitted to Scone Equine Hospital between 2005 and 2022 was analysed. Samples were collected at admission. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Susceptibility results from the two study periods were compared using Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was achieved at P value <0.05.

Results: From 1621 blood cultures submitted, 380 returned a positive result (380/1621; 23.4%). A total of 402 bacterial isolates were recovered: 55.5% Gram-positive isolates (223/402), 42.6% Gram-negative isolates (171/402) and 1.7% anaerobic isolates (7/409). A significant increase in Gram-positive isolates between time periods was observed (P = 0.002). Gram-negative isolates had significant increases of resistance in seven out of nine antimicrobials tested.

Conclusion: This study provides Australian veterinarians with information on common bacterial pathogens in critically ill neonatal foals to assist with making informed empirical antimicrobial choices to optimise treatment efficacy. Increases in bacterial resistance to commonly administered antimicrobials were observed; therefore, culture and sensitivity testing should guide antimicrobial choices. Judicious use of antimicrobials in equine practice is imperative.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Veterinary Journal
Australian Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Over the past 80 years, the Australian Veterinary Journal (AVJ) has been providing the veterinary profession with leading edge clinical and scientific research, case reports, reviews. news and timely coverage of industry issues. AJV is Australia''s premier veterinary science text and is distributed monthly to over 5,500 Australian Veterinary Association members and subscribers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信