Longitudinal Reliability of Milestones Learning Trajectories during Anesthesiology Residency.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005388
Ting Sun, Yoon Soo Park, Fei Chen, Sean O Hogan, Pedro Tanaka
{"title":"Longitudinal Reliability of Milestones Learning Trajectories during Anesthesiology Residency.","authors":"Ting Sun, Yoon Soo Park, Fei Chen, Sean O Hogan, Pedro Tanaka","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal Milestones data reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provide a structured framework for assessing the developmental progression of residents in key competencies and subcompetencies. This study aims to investigate the previously underexplored longitudinal reliability of Milestones data, with the goal of identifying patterns in learning trajectories that can inform targeted interventions for residents and programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted with national anesthesiology Milestones data collected from 2014 to 2020. Mixed-effects growth curve models were fit to model residents' growth trajectories. Longitudinal reliability was assessed using the indices of growth rate reliability and growth curve reliability. This study also examined variance components attributable to the factors at both the learner and program levels. Latent class growth analyses were performed to identify latent groups of learners with different learning trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 682,475 ratings for 4,976 learners in 140 programs. Growth curve model results indicated that the mean baseline Milestone rating across the 25 subcompetencies was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.96 to 2.14), with an average increase of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.51) units per reporting period. The growth rate reliability (mean ± SD, 0.58 ± 0.03) suggested a moderate capability of anesthesiology Milestones to detect individual differences in the growth of latent competency. Growth curve reliability estimates (mean ± SD, 0.71 ± 0.02) suggested acceptable overall reliability of Milestones across all the six assessment points. Significant variability was observed at both the program and learner levels ( P < 0.001). Latent class growth analyses identified 3 to 4 latent groups of learners with distinct learning trajectories across the 25 subcompetencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicated that the anesthesiology Milestones provide moderately reliable information for tracking individual progress over time. The findings underscore the importance of using a multifaceted approach to assessment and providing individualized learning plans to support resident development.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"918-928"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal Milestones data reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provide a structured framework for assessing the developmental progression of residents in key competencies and subcompetencies. This study aims to investigate the previously underexplored longitudinal reliability of Milestones data, with the goal of identifying patterns in learning trajectories that can inform targeted interventions for residents and programs.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with national anesthesiology Milestones data collected from 2014 to 2020. Mixed-effects growth curve models were fit to model residents' growth trajectories. Longitudinal reliability was assessed using the indices of growth rate reliability and growth curve reliability. This study also examined variance components attributable to the factors at both the learner and program levels. Latent class growth analyses were performed to identify latent groups of learners with different learning trajectories.

Results: The study included a total of 682,475 ratings for 4,976 learners in 140 programs. Growth curve model results indicated that the mean baseline Milestone rating across the 25 subcompetencies was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.96 to 2.14), with an average increase of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.51) units per reporting period. The growth rate reliability (mean ± SD, 0.58 ± 0.03) suggested a moderate capability of anesthesiology Milestones to detect individual differences in the growth of latent competency. Growth curve reliability estimates (mean ± SD, 0.71 ± 0.02) suggested acceptable overall reliability of Milestones across all the six assessment points. Significant variability was observed at both the program and learner levels ( P < 0.001). Latent class growth analyses identified 3 to 4 latent groups of learners with distinct learning trajectories across the 25 subcompetencies.

Conclusions: The study indicated that the anesthesiology Milestones provide moderately reliable information for tracking individual progress over time. The findings underscore the importance of using a multifaceted approach to assessment and providing individualized learning plans to support resident development.

麻醉住院医师里程碑学习轨迹的纵向可靠性。
背景:向研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)报告的纵向里程碑数据为评估住院医生在关键能力和次能力方面的发展进展提供了一个结构化的框架。本研究旨在调查以前未被充分探索的里程碑数据的纵向可靠性,目的是确定学习轨迹中的模式,从而为住院医生和项目提供有针对性的干预措施。方法:我们对2014年至2020年收集的国家麻醉学里程碑数据进行回顾性队列研究。混合效应生长曲线模型适合于模拟居民的生长轨迹。纵向信度采用增长率信度(GRR)和增长曲线信度(GCR)进行评价。我们还检查了可归因于学习者和项目水平因素的方差成分。本研究采用潜在类别成长分析(LCGA)来鉴定具有不同学习轨迹的学习者潜在群体。结果:该研究包括140个项目的4976名学习者的682,475个评分。生长曲线模型结果表明,25个子能力的平均基线Milestone评级为2.05 (95% CI: 1.96-2.14),每个报告期平均增加0.49 (95% CI: 0.48-0.51)个单位。GRR(均值±标准差,0.58±0.03)表明麻醉里程碑在检测潜在胜任力成长的个体差异方面具有中等能力。GCR估计(平均值±标准差,0.76±0.02)表明所有六个评估点的里程碑总体可靠性可接受。在程序和学习者水平上观察到显著的变异性(P < 0.001)。LCGA发现了3-4个潜在的学习者群体,他们在25个子能力中具有不同的学习轨迹。结论:我们的研究表明,麻醉里程碑为跟踪个体进展提供了适度可靠的信息。研究结果强调了采用多方面评估方法和提供个性化学习计划以支持居民发展的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信