Longitudinal Reliability of Milestones Learning Trajectories during Anesthesiology Residency.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005388
Ting Sun, Yoon Soo Park, Fei Chen, Sean O Hogan, Pedro Tanaka
{"title":"Longitudinal Reliability of Milestones Learning Trajectories during Anesthesiology Residency.","authors":"Ting Sun, Yoon Soo Park, Fei Chen, Sean O Hogan, Pedro Tanaka","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal Milestones data reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provide a structured framework for assessing the developmental progression of residents in key competencies and subcompetencies. This study aims to investigate the previously underexplored longitudinal reliability of Milestones data, with the goal of identifying patterns in learning trajectories that can inform targeted interventions for residents and programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted with national anesthesiology Milestones data collected from 2014 to 2020. Mixed-effects growth curve models were fit to model residents' growth trajectories. Longitudinal reliability was assessed using the indices of growth rate reliability and growth curve reliability. This study also examined variance components attributable to the factors at both the learner and program levels. Latent class growth analyses were performed to identify latent groups of learners with different learning trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 682,475 ratings for 4,976 learners in 140 programs. Growth curve model results indicated that the mean baseline Milestone rating across the 25 subcompetencies was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.96 to 2.14), with an average increase of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.51) units per reporting period. The growth rate reliability (mean ± SD, 0.58 ± 0.03) suggested a moderate capability of anesthesiology Milestones to detect individual differences in the growth of latent competency. Growth curve reliability estimates (mean ± SD, 0.71 ± 0.02) suggested acceptable overall reliability of Milestones across all the six assessment points. Significant variability was observed at both the program and learner levels ( P < 0.001). Latent class growth analyses identified 3 to 4 latent groups of learners with distinct learning trajectories across the 25 subcompetencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicated that the anesthesiology Milestones provide moderately reliable information for tracking individual progress over time. The findings underscore the importance of using a multifaceted approach to assessment and providing individualized learning plans to support resident development.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"918-928"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal Milestones data reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provide a structured framework for assessing the developmental progression of residents in key competencies and subcompetencies. This study aims to investigate the previously underexplored longitudinal reliability of Milestones data, with the goal of identifying patterns in learning trajectories that can inform targeted interventions for residents and programs.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with national anesthesiology Milestones data collected from 2014 to 2020. Mixed-effects growth curve models were fit to model residents' growth trajectories. Longitudinal reliability was assessed using the indices of growth rate reliability and growth curve reliability. This study also examined variance components attributable to the factors at both the learner and program levels. Latent class growth analyses were performed to identify latent groups of learners with different learning trajectories.

Results: The study included a total of 682,475 ratings for 4,976 learners in 140 programs. Growth curve model results indicated that the mean baseline Milestone rating across the 25 subcompetencies was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.96 to 2.14), with an average increase of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.51) units per reporting period. The growth rate reliability (mean ± SD, 0.58 ± 0.03) suggested a moderate capability of anesthesiology Milestones to detect individual differences in the growth of latent competency. Growth curve reliability estimates (mean ± SD, 0.71 ± 0.02) suggested acceptable overall reliability of Milestones across all the six assessment points. Significant variability was observed at both the program and learner levels ( P < 0.001). Latent class growth analyses identified 3 to 4 latent groups of learners with distinct learning trajectories across the 25 subcompetencies.

Conclusions: The study indicated that the anesthesiology Milestones provide moderately reliable information for tracking individual progress over time. The findings underscore the importance of using a multifaceted approach to assessment and providing individualized learning plans to support resident development.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信