Fracture-Related Infection Diagnostic Tools in the Upper Extremity: A Scoping Review.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Cristian A Desimone, Alexander J Adams, Nathaniel P Kern, Amir R Kachooei, Pedro Beredjiklian
{"title":"Fracture-Related Infection Diagnostic Tools in the Upper Extremity: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Cristian A Desimone, Alexander J Adams, Nathaniel P Kern, Amir R Kachooei, Pedro Beredjiklian","doi":"10.52628/90.4.13052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a serious orthopaedic complication and its diagnosis, particularly in the upper extremity, is difficult and poorly defined in current literature. An international consensus definition of FRI was published in 2018, and our scoping review aims to investigate FRI diagnostic tools reported in the primary literature and their biostatistical utility. A review of articles generated from the PubMed/NCBI search term \"fracture-related infection\" was undertaken using PRISMA methodology. The included studies were published from January 2018 to June 2022 and referred to FRI diagnosis in the upper extremity. Of 224 returned studies, 32 articles were selected for further review after fellowship-trained senior author assessment. Of these, 16 had quantitative and reportable data regarding the diagnosis of upper extremity FRI. The most common diagnostic methods reported were CRP (8 studies), WBC (7), and ESR (5), consistent with 1 of the six suggestive criteria from the consensus definition. Meta-analysis was performed. Primary literature regarding the diagnosis of upper extremity fracture-related infections is sparse and variable despite FRI's diagnostic and therapeutic complexity. Recent literature does not reflect the proposed criteria of the 2018 consensus definition; further primary research is needed to validate these criteria and their accuracy and utility Level of Evidence: 3b.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 4","pages":"769-776"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.13052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a serious orthopaedic complication and its diagnosis, particularly in the upper extremity, is difficult and poorly defined in current literature. An international consensus definition of FRI was published in 2018, and our scoping review aims to investigate FRI diagnostic tools reported in the primary literature and their biostatistical utility. A review of articles generated from the PubMed/NCBI search term "fracture-related infection" was undertaken using PRISMA methodology. The included studies were published from January 2018 to June 2022 and referred to FRI diagnosis in the upper extremity. Of 224 returned studies, 32 articles were selected for further review after fellowship-trained senior author assessment. Of these, 16 had quantitative and reportable data regarding the diagnosis of upper extremity FRI. The most common diagnostic methods reported were CRP (8 studies), WBC (7), and ESR (5), consistent with 1 of the six suggestive criteria from the consensus definition. Meta-analysis was performed. Primary literature regarding the diagnosis of upper extremity fracture-related infections is sparse and variable despite FRI's diagnostic and therapeutic complexity. Recent literature does not reflect the proposed criteria of the 2018 consensus definition; further primary research is needed to validate these criteria and their accuracy and utility Level of Evidence: 3b.

上肢骨折相关感染诊断工具:范围综述。
骨折相关感染(FRI)是一种严重的骨科并发症,在目前的文献中,其诊断困难且定义不清,尤其是在上肢。FRI的国际共识定义于2018年发表,我们的范围审查旨在调查主要文献中报道的FRI诊断工具及其生物统计学用途。使用PRISMA方法对PubMed/NCBI检索词“骨折相关感染”中生成的文章进行综述。纳入的研究发表于2018年1月至2022年6月,涉及上肢FRI诊断。在224篇返回的研究中,经过研究金培训的高级作者评估,选择了32篇文章进行进一步审查。其中,16例有关于上肢FRI诊断的定量和可报告的数据,报道的最常见的诊断方法是CRP(8项研究),WBC(7项)和ESR(5项),与共识定义的6个提示标准中的1个一致。进行meta分析。尽管FRI的诊断和治疗很复杂,但关于上肢骨折相关感染诊断的主要文献很少且变化多端。近期文献未反映2018年共识定义的拟议标准;需要进一步的初步研究来验证这些标准及其准确性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信