Comparative outcomes of proximal fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective analysis.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Hünkar Cagdas Bayrak, Ibrahim Faruk Adiguzel, Mahircan Demir, Bekir Karagöz, Samed Ordu
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of proximal fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Hünkar Cagdas Bayrak, Ibrahim Faruk Adiguzel, Mahircan Demir, Bekir Karagöz, Samed Ordu","doi":"10.52628/90.4.12000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely used procedure for delaying knee arthroplasty, correcting alignment, and relieving symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Recently, proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) has emerged as a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative. This study compares the outcomes of HTO and PFO to evaluate whether PFO can deliver results comparable to HTO in similar patient populations. A total of 96 patients treated between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed, with 54 patients undergoing HTO and 42 undergoing PFO. Subgroups were also created based on body mass index (BMI): non-obese HTO, obese HTO, non-obese PFO, and obese PFO. For each patient, we recorded demographic data, preoperative and 1-year postoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, medial joint space (MJS) measurements, mechanical axis deviations (MAD), Kellgren- Lawrence grade (KL), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and any complications. Both HTO and PFO led to significant improvements in OKS, VAS, MJS width, and MAD. Age, KL grade distribution, BMI, and MPTA values were comparable across the groups. Overall, HTO showed superior clinical (OKS, VAS) and radiological (MJS, MAD) outcomes, particularly in non-obese patients. Among obese patients, HTO and PFO achieved similar clinical improvements, although HTO maintained a radiological advantage. Importantly, a lower preoperative MPTA was associated with poorer clinical outcomes in the PFO group. In conclusion, while PFO can produce meaningful clinical and radiological improvements, HTO remains the more effective option in terms of both clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with a BMI below 30. For patients with a BMI over 30, HTO preserves its radiological superiority, although its clinical benefits are comparable to those of PFO. Additionally, a low preoperative MPTA is significantly linked to worse OKS scores in patients undergoing PFO.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 4","pages":"629-638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.4.12000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely used procedure for delaying knee arthroplasty, correcting alignment, and relieving symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Recently, proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) has emerged as a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative. This study compares the outcomes of HTO and PFO to evaluate whether PFO can deliver results comparable to HTO in similar patient populations. A total of 96 patients treated between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed, with 54 patients undergoing HTO and 42 undergoing PFO. Subgroups were also created based on body mass index (BMI): non-obese HTO, obese HTO, non-obese PFO, and obese PFO. For each patient, we recorded demographic data, preoperative and 1-year postoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, medial joint space (MJS) measurements, mechanical axis deviations (MAD), Kellgren- Lawrence grade (KL), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and any complications. Both HTO and PFO led to significant improvements in OKS, VAS, MJS width, and MAD. Age, KL grade distribution, BMI, and MPTA values were comparable across the groups. Overall, HTO showed superior clinical (OKS, VAS) and radiological (MJS, MAD) outcomes, particularly in non-obese patients. Among obese patients, HTO and PFO achieved similar clinical improvements, although HTO maintained a radiological advantage. Importantly, a lower preoperative MPTA was associated with poorer clinical outcomes in the PFO group. In conclusion, while PFO can produce meaningful clinical and radiological improvements, HTO remains the more effective option in terms of both clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with a BMI below 30. For patients with a BMI over 30, HTO preserves its radiological superiority, although its clinical benefits are comparable to those of PFO. Additionally, a low preoperative MPTA is significantly linked to worse OKS scores in patients undergoing PFO.

腓骨近端截骨术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的比较结果:回顾性分析。
胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)是一种广泛使用的手术,用于延迟膝关节置换术,纠正对齐,缓解膝骨关节炎患者的症状。最近,腓骨近端截骨术(PFO)作为一种侵入性更小、成本效益更高的替代方法出现。本研究比较了HTO和PFO的结果,以评估PFO是否能在相似的患者群体中提供与HTO相当的结果。2018年至2022年共分析了96例患者,其中54例接受HTO, 42例接受PFO。还根据身体质量指数(BMI)创建了亚组:非肥胖HTO,肥胖HTO,非肥胖PFO和肥胖PFO。对于每位患者,我们记录了人口统计学数据、术前和术后1年牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、内侧关节间隙(MJS)测量、机械轴偏差(MAD)、Kellgren- Lawrence分级(KL)、内侧胫骨近端角(MPTA)和任何并发症。HTO和PFO均能显著改善OKS、VAS、MJS宽度和MAD。年龄、KL分级分布、BMI和MPTA值在各组间具有可比性。总体而言,HTO表现出优越的临床(OKS, VAS)和放射学(MJS, MAD)结果,特别是在非肥胖患者中。在肥胖患者中,HTO和PFO取得了相似的临床改善,尽管HTO保持了放射学优势。重要的是,术前MPTA较低与PFO组较差的临床结果相关。总之,虽然PFO可以产生有意义的临床和放射学改善,但就BMI低于30的患者的临床和放射学结果而言,HTO仍然是更有效的选择。对于BMI超过30的患者,HTO保留其放射学优势,尽管其临床益处与PFO相当。此外,术前MPTA低与PFO患者较差的OKS评分显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信