Environmental impact of peat alternatives in growing media for European mushroom production

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Pietro Goglio , Thomas Ponsioen , Jaime Carrasco , Francesco Tei , Elsje Oosterkamp , Margarita Pérez , Jan van der Wolf , Nancy Pyck
{"title":"Environmental impact of peat alternatives in growing media for European mushroom production","authors":"Pietro Goglio ,&nbsp;Thomas Ponsioen ,&nbsp;Jaime Carrasco ,&nbsp;Francesco Tei ,&nbsp;Elsje Oosterkamp ,&nbsp;Margarita Pérez ,&nbsp;Jan van der Wolf ,&nbsp;Nancy Pyck","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Button mushrooms are an important protein source with a production of &gt;48 million metric tonnes in 2021. Several life cycle assessments (LCAs) have been employed in assessing mushroom cultivation. This paper assessed potential impacts of relevant alternatives (sphagnum moss, grass fibres, spent casing and bark) to peat as casing materials for mushroom production across Europe by using LCA using a cradle to farm gate approach. Here, we: i) compared the environmental impacts of mushroom produced with different growing media across Europe ii) identified environmental hotspots across the value chains of mushroom growing media and iii) provide insights on the sustainability of mushroom growing media production. Two functional units have been used the kg and € of harvested mushrooms. Data were gathered from mushroom producers and casing processors across Europe.</div><div>Changes in casing material for mushroom production caused environmental trade-offs, by reducing the resource use for fossil and by moderately changing (&lt;7.7 %) all other impacts assessed here except the bark used as casing material which caused a reduction for all impact categories. Thus, each of the casing alternative material could substitute peat in mushroom production with limited environmental impacts if productivity does not decrease. LCA demonstrated advantages or disadvantages of replacing part of the peat casings by other alternatives (e.g., sphagnum moss, spent casing, grass fibre, bark). As switching to alternatives becomes more urgent in the near future, potential trade-offs, advantages and disadvantages of using less peat need to be identified using a broader range of alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"964 ","pages":"Article 178624"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972500258X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Button mushrooms are an important protein source with a production of >48 million metric tonnes in 2021. Several life cycle assessments (LCAs) have been employed in assessing mushroom cultivation. This paper assessed potential impacts of relevant alternatives (sphagnum moss, grass fibres, spent casing and bark) to peat as casing materials for mushroom production across Europe by using LCA using a cradle to farm gate approach. Here, we: i) compared the environmental impacts of mushroom produced with different growing media across Europe ii) identified environmental hotspots across the value chains of mushroom growing media and iii) provide insights on the sustainability of mushroom growing media production. Two functional units have been used the kg and € of harvested mushrooms. Data were gathered from mushroom producers and casing processors across Europe.
Changes in casing material for mushroom production caused environmental trade-offs, by reducing the resource use for fossil and by moderately changing (<7.7 %) all other impacts assessed here except the bark used as casing material which caused a reduction for all impact categories. Thus, each of the casing alternative material could substitute peat in mushroom production with limited environmental impacts if productivity does not decrease. LCA demonstrated advantages or disadvantages of replacing part of the peat casings by other alternatives (e.g., sphagnum moss, spent casing, grass fibre, bark). As switching to alternatives becomes more urgent in the near future, potential trade-offs, advantages and disadvantages of using less peat need to be identified using a broader range of alternatives.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信