Identifying silver ore sources for the earliest coins of Athens

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Gillan Davis, Janne Blichert-Toft, Liesel Gentelli, Damian B. Gore, Kenneth A. Sheedy, Francis Albarède
{"title":"Identifying silver ore sources for the earliest coins of Athens","authors":"Gillan Davis,&nbsp;Janne Blichert-Toft,&nbsp;Liesel Gentelli,&nbsp;Damian B. Gore,&nbsp;Kenneth A. Sheedy,&nbsp;Francis Albarède","doi":"10.1007/s12520-024-02120-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study addresses longstanding questions concerning the ore sources used in the first series of coins of ancient Athens known as the <i>Wappenmϋnzen</i> (c.540-c.500 BCE) by combining comprehensive numismatic data on 22 coins (16 new and 6 legacy analyses) with lead isotope and surface elemental measurements (MC-ICP-MS and XRF). It finds usage of ores from Spain to Romania and Türkiye and frequent mixing. This upends current thinking based on a (mis)interpretation of historical sources which argues that the tyrant Peisistratos and his sons, who ruled Athens during the period, sourced most silver from the districts of Mt Pangaion and Strymon River in northern Greece and that silver did not flow from the western Mediterranean into their coinage. The data suggest that domestic ‘Lavrion’ mines of Athens did not contribute to the ore stock of the <i>Wappenmϋnzen</i> until the subsequent production of the ‘owl’ series when it was also used in some <i>Wappenmϋnzen</i> fractions and show that there is no correlation between coin types and ore sources. Elemental compositions nuance our understanding of the coins, but do not shed light on provenance. Together, these new findings force a reappraisal of numismatic and historical perceptions of the period of the Athenian tyranny in the lead up to democracy, not least because the multiple silver sources point to trading relationships with a greater variety of regions than previously contemplated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02120-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses longstanding questions concerning the ore sources used in the first series of coins of ancient Athens known as the Wappenmϋnzen (c.540-c.500 BCE) by combining comprehensive numismatic data on 22 coins (16 new and 6 legacy analyses) with lead isotope and surface elemental measurements (MC-ICP-MS and XRF). It finds usage of ores from Spain to Romania and Türkiye and frequent mixing. This upends current thinking based on a (mis)interpretation of historical sources which argues that the tyrant Peisistratos and his sons, who ruled Athens during the period, sourced most silver from the districts of Mt Pangaion and Strymon River in northern Greece and that silver did not flow from the western Mediterranean into their coinage. The data suggest that domestic ‘Lavrion’ mines of Athens did not contribute to the ore stock of the Wappenmϋnzen until the subsequent production of the ‘owl’ series when it was also used in some Wappenmϋnzen fractions and show that there is no correlation between coin types and ore sources. Elemental compositions nuance our understanding of the coins, but do not shed light on provenance. Together, these new findings force a reappraisal of numismatic and historical perceptions of the period of the Athenian tyranny in the lead up to democracy, not least because the multiple silver sources point to trading relationships with a greater variety of regions than previously contemplated.

鉴定雅典最早钱币的银矿来源。
这项研究解决了一个长期存在的问题,即古雅典第一批硬币Wappenmϋnzen(约540-约500)中使用的矿石来源通过将22枚硬币(16枚新硬币和6枚旧硬币)的综合钱币数据与铅同位素和表面元素测量(MC-ICP-MS和XRF)相结合。它发现从西班牙到罗马尼亚和土耳其的矿石的使用和频繁的混合。这颠覆了基于对历史资料(错误)解释的当前想法,该解释认为,在此期间统治雅典的暴君庇西特拉托斯和他的儿子们从希腊北部的潘盖翁山和斯特雷蒙河地区采购了大部分白银,而白银并没有从西地中海流入他们的硬币中。数据表明,雅典国内的“Lavrion”矿山并没有贡献Wappenmϋnzen的矿石库存,直到随后生产的“猫头鹰”系列,当它也被用于一些Wappenmϋnzen分数,并表明硬币类型和矿石来源之间没有相关性。元素组成使我们对硬币的理解有了细微的差别,但并不能说明硬币的来源。综上所述,这些新发现迫使我们重新评估从货币和历史上对雅典暴政到民主时期的看法,尤其是因为多种白银来源表明,雅典与更多地区的贸易关系比之前预想的要多。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s12520-024-02120-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信