A review on arsenic contamination in drinking water: sources, health impacts, and remediation approaches.

IF 3.9 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
RSC Advances Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1039/d4ra08867k
Bashdar Abuzed Sadee, Salih M S Zebari, Yaseen Galali, Mahmood Fadhil Saleem
{"title":"A review on arsenic contamination in drinking water: sources, health impacts, and remediation approaches.","authors":"Bashdar Abuzed Sadee, Salih M S Zebari, Yaseen Galali, Mahmood Fadhil Saleem","doi":"10.1039/d4ra08867k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arsenic (As) contamination in groundwater has become a global concern, and it poses a serious threat to the health of millions of people. Groundwater with high As concentrations has been reported worldwide. It is widely recognized that the toxicity of As largely depends on its chemical forms, making As speciation a critical issue. Numerous studies on As speciation have been conducted, extending beyond the general knowledge on As to the toxicity and health issues caused by exposure to various As species in water. This article reviews various As species, their sources and health effects, and treatment methods for the removal of As from contaminated water. Additionally, various established and emerging technologies for the removal of As contaminants from the environment, including adsorption (using rocks, soils, minerals, industrial by-products, biosorbents, biochars, and microalgal and fungal biomass), ion exchange, phytoremediation, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, and membrane technologies, are discussed. Treating As-contaminated drinking water is considered the most effective approach to minimize the associated health risks. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of various remediation and removal methods are outlined, along with their key advantages. Among these techniques, the simplicity, low cost, and ease of operation make adsorption techniques desirable, particularly with the use of novel functional materials like graphite oxides, metal-organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes, and other emerging functional materials, which are promising future alternatives for As removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":102,"journal":{"name":"RSC Advances","volume":"15 4","pages":"2684-2703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Advances","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra08867k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arsenic (As) contamination in groundwater has become a global concern, and it poses a serious threat to the health of millions of people. Groundwater with high As concentrations has been reported worldwide. It is widely recognized that the toxicity of As largely depends on its chemical forms, making As speciation a critical issue. Numerous studies on As speciation have been conducted, extending beyond the general knowledge on As to the toxicity and health issues caused by exposure to various As species in water. This article reviews various As species, their sources and health effects, and treatment methods for the removal of As from contaminated water. Additionally, various established and emerging technologies for the removal of As contaminants from the environment, including adsorption (using rocks, soils, minerals, industrial by-products, biosorbents, biochars, and microalgal and fungal biomass), ion exchange, phytoremediation, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, and membrane technologies, are discussed. Treating As-contaminated drinking water is considered the most effective approach to minimize the associated health risks. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of various remediation and removal methods are outlined, along with their key advantages. Among these techniques, the simplicity, low cost, and ease of operation make adsorption techniques desirable, particularly with the use of novel functional materials like graphite oxides, metal-organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes, and other emerging functional materials, which are promising future alternatives for As removal.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RSC Advances
RSC Advances chemical sciences-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
3116
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal covering all of the chemical sciences, including multidisciplinary and emerging areas. RSC Advances is a gold open access journal allowing researchers free access to research articles, and offering an affordable open access publishing option for authors around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信