A Probabilistic View of Forbidden Links: Their Prevalence and Their Consequences for the Robustness of Plant–Hummingbird Communities

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1111/ele.70073
François Duchenne, Elisa Barreto, Esteban A. Guevara, Holger Beck, Carolina Bello, Rafaela Bobato, Daniela Bôlla, Emanuel Brenes, Nicole Büttner, Ana P. Caron, Nelson Chaves-Elizondo, María J. Gavilanes, Alejandro Restrepo-González, Jose Alejandro Castro, Miriam Kaehler, Tiago Machado-de-Souza, Miguel Machnicki-Reis, Andrés Sebastián F. Marcayata, Cauã G. de Menezes, Andrea Nieto, Rafael de Oliveira, Ricardo A. C. de Oliveira, Friederike Richter, Bryan G. Rojas, Luciele L. Romanowski, Wellinton L. de Souza, Danila S. Veluza, Ben Weinstein, Rafael O. Wüest, Thais B. Zanata, Krystal Zuniga, María A. Maglianesi, Tatiana Santander, Isabela G. Varassin, Catherine H. Graham
{"title":"A Probabilistic View of Forbidden Links: Their Prevalence and Their Consequences for the Robustness of Plant–Hummingbird Communities","authors":"François Duchenne,&nbsp;Elisa Barreto,&nbsp;Esteban A. Guevara,&nbsp;Holger Beck,&nbsp;Carolina Bello,&nbsp;Rafaela Bobato,&nbsp;Daniela Bôlla,&nbsp;Emanuel Brenes,&nbsp;Nicole Büttner,&nbsp;Ana P. Caron,&nbsp;Nelson Chaves-Elizondo,&nbsp;María J. Gavilanes,&nbsp;Alejandro Restrepo-González,&nbsp;Jose Alejandro Castro,&nbsp;Miriam Kaehler,&nbsp;Tiago Machado-de-Souza,&nbsp;Miguel Machnicki-Reis,&nbsp;Andrés Sebastián F. Marcayata,&nbsp;Cauã G. de Menezes,&nbsp;Andrea Nieto,&nbsp;Rafael de Oliveira,&nbsp;Ricardo A. C. de Oliveira,&nbsp;Friederike Richter,&nbsp;Bryan G. Rojas,&nbsp;Luciele L. Romanowski,&nbsp;Wellinton L. de Souza,&nbsp;Danila S. Veluza,&nbsp;Ben Weinstein,&nbsp;Rafael O. Wüest,&nbsp;Thais B. Zanata,&nbsp;Krystal Zuniga,&nbsp;María A. Maglianesi,&nbsp;Tatiana Santander,&nbsp;Isabela G. Varassin,&nbsp;Catherine H. Graham","doi":"10.1111/ele.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The presence in ecological communities of unfeasible species interactions, termed forbidden links, due to physiological or morphological exploitation barriers has been long debated, but little direct evidence has been found. Forbidden links are likely to make ecological communities less robust to species extinctions, stressing the need to assess their prevalence. Here, we used a dataset of plant–hummingbird interactions, coupled with a Bayesian hierarchical model, to assess the importance of exploitation barriers in determining species interactions. We found evidence for exploitation barriers between flowers and hummingbirds across the 32 studied communities; however, the proportion of forbidden links changed drastically among communities because of changes in trait distributions. The higher the proportion of forbidden links, the more they decreased network robustness because of constraints on interaction rewiring. Our results suggest that exploitation barriers are not rare in plant–hummingbird communities and have the potential to limit the rescue of species experiencing partner extinction.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence in ecological communities of unfeasible species interactions, termed forbidden links, due to physiological or morphological exploitation barriers has been long debated, but little direct evidence has been found. Forbidden links are likely to make ecological communities less robust to species extinctions, stressing the need to assess their prevalence. Here, we used a dataset of plant–hummingbird interactions, coupled with a Bayesian hierarchical model, to assess the importance of exploitation barriers in determining species interactions. We found evidence for exploitation barriers between flowers and hummingbirds across the 32 studied communities; however, the proportion of forbidden links changed drastically among communities because of changes in trait distributions. The higher the proportion of forbidden links, the more they decreased network robustness because of constraints on interaction rewiring. Our results suggest that exploitation barriers are not rare in plant–hummingbird communities and have the potential to limit the rescue of species experiencing partner extinction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

禁止链接的概率观点:它们的流行及其对植物-蜂鸟群落稳健性的影响
由于生理或形态的开发障碍,在生态群落中存在不可行的物种相互作用,称为禁止链接,这是一个长期争论的问题,但很少有直接证据发现。被禁止的联系可能会使生态群落对物种灭绝的抵抗力下降,这就强调了评估物种灭绝的普遍程度的必要性。在这里,我们使用植物-蜂鸟相互作用的数据集,结合贝叶斯层次模型来评估开发障碍在决定物种相互作用中的重要性。我们在32个被研究的群落中发现了花和蜂鸟之间存在开发障碍的证据;然而,由于性状分布的变化,群落间禁用链接的比例发生了巨大变化。禁止链接的比例越高,由于交互重新布线的限制,它们越降低网络的鲁棒性。我们的研究结果表明,在植物-蜂鸟群落中,开发障碍并不罕见,并且有可能限制对经历伴侣灭绝的物种的拯救。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信