{"title":"Carbon risk and technological mergers and acquisitions(M&A):The perspective of institutional pressures","authors":"Jinyu Chen, Yirui Fan, Yan Yang, Ying Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing urgency of climate issues, this paper examines whether companies accelerate low-carbon transitions and manage rising carbon risk by technological mergers and acquisitions (M&A). This paper explores the effect of carbon risk on technological M&A from the perspective of institutional pressures, using data from listed companies over the period 2009 to 2020. Our research results indicate that high carbon emission firms are more likely to engage in technological M&A, and this holds consistently after various robustness checks. Cross-sectional analysis indicates that the impact of carbon risk on technological M&A activities is notably stronger in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and companies with fewer financing constraints. Furthermore, normative pressure significantly strengthens the impact of carbon risk on technological M&A, while coercive and mimetic pressures weaken this effect. Our findings shed insight on the motivation of corporate technological M&A strategy from the perspective of carbon risk, and provide practical guidance to promote sustainable environmental development.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the growing urgency of climate issues, this paper examines whether companies accelerate low-carbon transitions and manage rising carbon risk by technological mergers and acquisitions (M&A). This paper explores the effect of carbon risk on technological M&A from the perspective of institutional pressures, using data from listed companies over the period 2009 to 2020. Our research results indicate that high carbon emission firms are more likely to engage in technological M&A, and this holds consistently after various robustness checks. Cross-sectional analysis indicates that the impact of carbon risk on technological M&A activities is notably stronger in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and companies with fewer financing constraints. Furthermore, normative pressure significantly strengthens the impact of carbon risk on technological M&A, while coercive and mimetic pressures weaken this effect. Our findings shed insight on the motivation of corporate technological M&A strategy from the perspective of carbon risk, and provide practical guidance to promote sustainable environmental development.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.