Effects of blenderized watermelon consumption on satiety and postprandial glucose in overweight and obese adolescents

Caitlin Rasmussen, Martin Rosas Jr., Isabella Gallardo, Anna J. Kwon, Hoa Luu, Changqi Liu, Shirin Hooshmand, Mark Kern, Mee Young Hong
{"title":"Effects of blenderized watermelon consumption on satiety and postprandial glucose in overweight and obese adolescents","authors":"Caitlin Rasmussen,&nbsp;Martin Rosas Jr.,&nbsp;Isabella Gallardo,&nbsp;Anna J. Kwon,&nbsp;Hoa Luu,&nbsp;Changqi Liu,&nbsp;Shirin Hooshmand,&nbsp;Mark Kern,&nbsp;Mee Young Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.metop.2025.100345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Watermelon and its rind are rich in fiber, vitamins, minerals, and L-citrulline. Despite these nutritional benefits, research on the effects of blenderized watermelon (WM), especially in adolescents, remains limited. This study aimed to address this gap by examining the impact of blenderized WM (<em>Citrullus lanatus</em>, including both flesh and rind) on satiety, postprandial glucose responses, and overall acceptability among overweight and obese adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a randomized crossover design, 20 participants consumed 240 mL of either blenderized watermelon (WM) or an isocaloric sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) on separate days. A triangle sensory test assessed participants' ability to distinguish between WM with and without rind, while acceptability assessments rated flavor, sweetness, and overall satisfaction using a seven-point hedonic scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Blenderized WM consumption resulted in significantly lower postprandial glucose levels at 20 and 40 min (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to SSB. Satiety responses showed delayed increases in hunger and desire to eat with WM. Feelings of fullness increased at 20 min for WM (<em>P</em> = 0.033), while SSB resulted in lower fullness than baseline at 120 min (<em>P</em> = 0.006). Participants reported increased appetite after 120 min with WM, compared to 60 min with SSB (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In the triangle sensory test, 70 % of participants correctly identified WM with and without rind, with acceptability assessments favoring WM without rind.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Blenderized WM shows potential for stabilizing postprandial glucose levels and enhancing satiety in overweight and obese adolescents. However, improving the sensory qualities of WM with rind is crucial to increase its appeal as a healthier alternative to sugary snacks. While these findings highlight its promise for managing glucose and promoting satiety, further efforts to enhance its palatability are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94141,"journal":{"name":"Metabolism open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolism open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936825000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Watermelon and its rind are rich in fiber, vitamins, minerals, and L-citrulline. Despite these nutritional benefits, research on the effects of blenderized watermelon (WM), especially in adolescents, remains limited. This study aimed to address this gap by examining the impact of blenderized WM (Citrullus lanatus, including both flesh and rind) on satiety, postprandial glucose responses, and overall acceptability among overweight and obese adolescents.

Methods

In a randomized crossover design, 20 participants consumed 240 mL of either blenderized watermelon (WM) or an isocaloric sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) on separate days. A triangle sensory test assessed participants' ability to distinguish between WM with and without rind, while acceptability assessments rated flavor, sweetness, and overall satisfaction using a seven-point hedonic scale.

Results

Blenderized WM consumption resulted in significantly lower postprandial glucose levels at 20 and 40 min (P < 0.01) compared to SSB. Satiety responses showed delayed increases in hunger and desire to eat with WM. Feelings of fullness increased at 20 min for WM (P = 0.033), while SSB resulted in lower fullness than baseline at 120 min (P = 0.006). Participants reported increased appetite after 120 min with WM, compared to 60 min with SSB (P < 0.05). In the triangle sensory test, 70 % of participants correctly identified WM with and without rind, with acceptability assessments favoring WM without rind.

Conclusion

Blenderized WM shows potential for stabilizing postprandial glucose levels and enhancing satiety in overweight and obese adolescents. However, improving the sensory qualities of WM with rind is crucial to increase its appeal as a healthier alternative to sugary snacks. While these findings highlight its promise for managing glucose and promoting satiety, further efforts to enhance its palatability are needed.
混合西瓜消费对超重和肥胖青少年饱腹感和餐后葡萄糖的影响。
背景:西瓜及其外皮富含纤维、维生素、矿物质和l -瓜氨酸。尽管有这些营养价值,但对混合西瓜(WM)影响的研究,特别是对青少年的影响,仍然有限。本研究旨在通过研究混合WM(包括瓜皮和瓜皮)对超重和肥胖青少年的饱腹感、餐后葡萄糖反应和总体可接受性的影响来解决这一差距。方法:在随机交叉设计中,20名参与者在不同的日子里饮用240毫升混合西瓜(WM)或等热量含糖饮料(SSB)。三角感官测试评估了参与者区分带皮和不带皮WM的能力,而可接受性评估评估了味道、甜度和总体满意度,使用了7分的享乐量表。结果:混合WM消耗导致餐后血糖水平在20和40分钟显著降低(P = 0.033),而SSB导致饱腹感在120分钟低于基线(P = 0.006)。参与者报告说,与SSB组相比,混合WM组在服用120分钟后食欲增加(P结论:混合WM显示出稳定超重和肥胖青少年餐后血糖水平和增强饱腹感的潜力。然而,提高带皮WM的感官品质对于增加其作为含糖零食的健康替代品的吸引力至关重要。虽然这些发现强调了它在控制葡萄糖和促进饱腹感方面的前景,但需要进一步努力提高其适口性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabolism open
Metabolism open Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General), Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信