Infants' saccadic behavior during 2-dimensional displays of a bounce

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Matúš Šimkovic, Birgit Träuble
{"title":"Infants' saccadic behavior during 2-dimensional displays of a bounce","authors":"Matúš Šimkovic,&nbsp;Birgit Träuble","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study examined the saccadic behavior of 4- to 10-month-old infants when tracking a two-dimensional linear motion of a circle that occasionally bounced off a barrier constituted by the screen edges. It was investigated whether infants could anticipate the angle of the circle’s direction after the bounce and the circle’s displacement from the location of bounce. Seven bounce types were presented which differed in the angle of incidence. Three of the seven bounce types showed physically implausible bounces. Saccades that started before the infant could perceive the bounce and ended after the bounce were analyzed. Infants’ saccades matched the circle’s displacement with sufficient accuracy to conclude that they made predictive saccades. Only results from two bounce types where the circle’s speed was less than 12.5°/s allowed for the possibility that infants made reactive saccades. The infants’ anticipated angle was close to the angle of the circle’s direction after the bounce. When the circle was moving at 40°/s, the difference between the two aforementioned angles was less than 15°, but it increased as the circle became slower. The effect of age on the saccade targets and other object-tracking measures was small and mostly masked by a large estimation error. Estimates of the saccade amplitude, saccade frequency, and the gaze-circle displacement were similar to those observed for saccades made when no bounce occurred and they were also similar to those reported in previous studies of infant object tracking with similar trajectories but without a barrier.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 102029"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638325000037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined the saccadic behavior of 4- to 10-month-old infants when tracking a two-dimensional linear motion of a circle that occasionally bounced off a barrier constituted by the screen edges. It was investigated whether infants could anticipate the angle of the circle’s direction after the bounce and the circle’s displacement from the location of bounce. Seven bounce types were presented which differed in the angle of incidence. Three of the seven bounce types showed physically implausible bounces. Saccades that started before the infant could perceive the bounce and ended after the bounce were analyzed. Infants’ saccades matched the circle’s displacement with sufficient accuracy to conclude that they made predictive saccades. Only results from two bounce types where the circle’s speed was less than 12.5°/s allowed for the possibility that infants made reactive saccades. The infants’ anticipated angle was close to the angle of the circle’s direction after the bounce. When the circle was moving at 40°/s, the difference between the two aforementioned angles was less than 15°, but it increased as the circle became slower. The effect of age on the saccade targets and other object-tracking measures was small and mostly masked by a large estimation error. Estimates of the saccade amplitude, saccade frequency, and the gaze-circle displacement were similar to those observed for saccades made when no bounce occurred and they were also similar to those reported in previous studies of infant object tracking with similar trajectories but without a barrier.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信