Physical therapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in a post-pandemic world.

Kevin McLaughlin, Kate I Minick, Julie M Fritz, Nicole Tannahill, Anne Spar, Marissa Feinsilver, Matthew Weber, Erika Opoku, Jeff Adams, Richard L Skolasky
{"title":"Physical therapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in a post-pandemic world.","authors":"Kevin McLaughlin, Kate I Minick, Julie M Fritz, Nicole Tannahill, Anne Spar, Marissa Feinsilver, Matthew Weber, Erika Opoku, Jeff Adams, Richard L Skolasky","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.17.25320739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine physical therapists' experience providing telerehabilitation and their perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey of members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 208 completed responses to our survey invitation. Most physical therapists responding to our survey reported using little to no telerehabilitation prior to the pandemic but increased use during the pandemic, followed by decreased use of telerehabilitation after the pandemic. Respondents reported using telerehabilitation slightly more after the pandemic than beforehand. Physical therapists reported that they believed they could deliver effective care using telerehabilitation but that it was not as effective as in-clinic care and they would prefer to use telerehabilitation as part of a hybrid care model versus using only telerehabilitation. Physical therapists suggested that certain patients were more likely than others to benefit from telerehabilitation and identified specific factors (e.g., patient preference, self-efficacy, postoperative status) that influenced whom they would consider to be most appropriate for telerehabilitation. \"Patient issues with technology\" was identified as the most common barrier to telerehabilitation use. Most physical therapists reported that they planned to use telerehabilitation in the future and agreed that telerehabilitation plays an important role in expanding access to physical therapy in the United States.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical therapists believed that telerehabilitation continues to play an important role in a post-pandemic world. Although physical therapists reported that they considered telerehabilitation to be an effective method for delivering care, they did not consider it to be a replacement for in-clinic care and believed that certain patients are more likely than others to benefit from this approach.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>Physical therapists consider telerehabilitation to be a viable care option for patients with musculoskeletal pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.17.25320739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine physical therapists' experience providing telerehabilitation and their perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods: Survey of members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy.

Results: We received 208 completed responses to our survey invitation. Most physical therapists responding to our survey reported using little to no telerehabilitation prior to the pandemic but increased use during the pandemic, followed by decreased use of telerehabilitation after the pandemic. Respondents reported using telerehabilitation slightly more after the pandemic than beforehand. Physical therapists reported that they believed they could deliver effective care using telerehabilitation but that it was not as effective as in-clinic care and they would prefer to use telerehabilitation as part of a hybrid care model versus using only telerehabilitation. Physical therapists suggested that certain patients were more likely than others to benefit from telerehabilitation and identified specific factors (e.g., patient preference, self-efficacy, postoperative status) that influenced whom they would consider to be most appropriate for telerehabilitation. "Patient issues with technology" was identified as the most common barrier to telerehabilitation use. Most physical therapists reported that they planned to use telerehabilitation in the future and agreed that telerehabilitation plays an important role in expanding access to physical therapy in the United States.

Conclusions: Physical therapists believed that telerehabilitation continues to play an important role in a post-pandemic world. Although physical therapists reported that they considered telerehabilitation to be an effective method for delivering care, they did not consider it to be a replacement for in-clinic care and believed that certain patients are more likely than others to benefit from this approach.

Impact statement: Physical therapists consider telerehabilitation to be a viable care option for patients with musculoskeletal pain.

物理治疗师对大流行后世界肌肉骨骼疾病患者远程康复的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信