Sacubitril/valsartan role in patients with resistant hypertension: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hanselim Lim, Hendry Agustian, Vanny Febriana, Alice Inda Supit
{"title":"Sacubitril/valsartan role in patients with resistant hypertension: a systematic review.","authors":"Hanselim Lim, Hendry Agustian, Vanny Febriana, Alice Inda Supit","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), shows promising result in treating resistant hypertension (RH) but lacks comprehensive evaluation. We performed a systematic review to assess and compare the efficacy of ARNI in managing RH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search on multiple databases such as Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Studies comparing the effects of ARNI on blood pressure in adult RH patients were included in the review. Data extraction and synthesis followed PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. The primary outcome is to determine the effect of ARNI on blood pressure in RH patients, and the secondary outcome was to assess the safety of ARNI in RH patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies involving 915 RH patients were included in the systematic review. The sacubitril/valsartan dose used ranged between 100 and 400 mg/day. All studies reported a statistically significant reduction in blood pressure, with 24-h blood pressure reduction ranging from 15.8/6.5 to 16.6/9.3 mmHg and office systolic blood pressure reduction ranging from 24.7 to 10.3 mmHg. Additionally, two studies reported improvements in cardiac remodeling and left ventricular function associated with sacubitril/valsartan. The most common adverse events were hypotension and elevated serum potassium levels, though these were minimal and did not require discontinuation of ARNI therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan is a promising alternative to ARB or ACEi in managing RH, offering superior blood pressure reductions and potential benefits in reversing cardiac remodeling, while maintaining a favorable safety profile with minimal risk of serious adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2025.01.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), shows promising result in treating resistant hypertension (RH) but lacks comprehensive evaluation. We performed a systematic review to assess and compare the efficacy of ARNI in managing RH.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on multiple databases such as Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Studies comparing the effects of ARNI on blood pressure in adult RH patients were included in the review. Data extraction and synthesis followed PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. The primary outcome is to determine the effect of ARNI on blood pressure in RH patients, and the secondary outcome was to assess the safety of ARNI in RH patients.

Results: Four studies involving 915 RH patients were included in the systematic review. The sacubitril/valsartan dose used ranged between 100 and 400 mg/day. All studies reported a statistically significant reduction in blood pressure, with 24-h blood pressure reduction ranging from 15.8/6.5 to 16.6/9.3 mmHg and office systolic blood pressure reduction ranging from 24.7 to 10.3 mmHg. Additionally, two studies reported improvements in cardiac remodeling and left ventricular function associated with sacubitril/valsartan. The most common adverse events were hypotension and elevated serum potassium levels, though these were minimal and did not require discontinuation of ARNI therapy.

Conclusion: Sacubitril/valsartan is a promising alternative to ARB or ACEi in managing RH, offering superior blood pressure reductions and potential benefits in reversing cardiac remodeling, while maintaining a favorable safety profile with minimal risk of serious adverse events.

Sacubitril/缬沙坦在顽固性高血压患者中的作用:一项系统综述。
背景:血管紧张素受体neprilysin抑制剂(ARNI) Sacubitril/valsartan在治疗难治性高血压(RH)方面表现出良好的效果,但缺乏全面的评价。我们进行了一项系统综述来评估和比较ARNI在RH治疗中的疗效。方法:对Cochrane、ProQuest、PubMed、谷歌Scholar等多个数据库进行系统检索。比较ARNI对成年RH患者血压影响的研究被纳入综述。数据提取和合成遵循PRISMA指南,使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。主要结局是确定ARNI对RH患者血压的影响,次要结局是评估ARNI在RH患者中的安全性。结果:四项涉及915例RH患者的研究被纳入系统评价。使用的苏比里尔/缬沙坦剂量在100 - 400mg /天之间。所有研究都报告了具有统计学意义的血压降低,24小时血压降低范围为15.8/6.5至16.6/9.3 mmHg,办公室收缩压降低范围为24.7至10.3 mmHg。此外,两项研究报告了与苏比里尔/缬沙坦相关的心脏重塑和左心室功能的改善。最常见的不良事件是低血压和血清钾水平升高,尽管这些是最小的,不需要停止ARNI治疗。结论:Sacubitril/缬沙坦是ARB或ACEi治疗RH的一个有希望的替代方案,在逆转心脏重构方面提供卓越的降压和潜在的益处,同时保持良好的安全性,严重不良事件的风险最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信