Emily K. Spotts , Franklin G. Miller , Andrew L. Geers
{"title":"Individual difference factors that predict evaluations and acceptance of authorized concealment for the reduction of nocebo side effects","authors":"Emily K. Spotts , Franklin G. Miller , Andrew L. Geers","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.108676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Authorized concealment is a shared decision-making technique in which a clinician asks a patient if they would prefer not to be informed about all possible treatment side effects, so as to minimize nocebo effects. The present research assessed individual difference variables that predict evaluations and receptivity of authorized concealment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A demographically diverse national community US sample of 1012 adults (ages ranging from 18 to 94; <em>M</em>=43.2) learned about nocebo effects and then evaluated and estimated their likelihood of consenting to four possible methods of authorized concealment. A range of self-reported psychological, health, and demographic variables were tested as predictor variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The strongest and most reliable outcomes were that greater trust in doctors and a greater desire to avoid side effect knowledge predicted positive evaluations of authorized concealment and estimated personal use of authorized concealment. There was some evidence that women, those of older age, reporting better health, and using medicine more regularly, had a more positive response to authorized concealment, but these effects were dependent upon the specific method of authorized concealment described.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individual difference variables can predict openness to authorized concealment.</div></div><div><h3>Practice Implications</h3><div>This knowledge may benefit clinicians who consider employing this shared decision-making technique with patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 108676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125000436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Authorized concealment is a shared decision-making technique in which a clinician asks a patient if they would prefer not to be informed about all possible treatment side effects, so as to minimize nocebo effects. The present research assessed individual difference variables that predict evaluations and receptivity of authorized concealment.
Methods
A demographically diverse national community US sample of 1012 adults (ages ranging from 18 to 94; M=43.2) learned about nocebo effects and then evaluated and estimated their likelihood of consenting to four possible methods of authorized concealment. A range of self-reported psychological, health, and demographic variables were tested as predictor variables.
Results
The strongest and most reliable outcomes were that greater trust in doctors and a greater desire to avoid side effect knowledge predicted positive evaluations of authorized concealment and estimated personal use of authorized concealment. There was some evidence that women, those of older age, reporting better health, and using medicine more regularly, had a more positive response to authorized concealment, but these effects were dependent upon the specific method of authorized concealment described.
Conclusions
Individual difference variables can predict openness to authorized concealment.
Practice Implications
This knowledge may benefit clinicians who consider employing this shared decision-making technique with patients.
期刊介绍:
Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.