Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the cerebellar abnormalities: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zhen Sun, Yanqiu Chen, Qichen Su
{"title":"Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the cerebellar abnormalities: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhen Sun, Yanqiu Chen, Qichen Su","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2025.2453997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal cerebellar abnormalities are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and structural brain malformations. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for prenatal counseling and planning postnatal interventions. While prenatal ultrasound is a key tool for detecting fetal brain abnormalities, variations in diagnostic accuracy across studies necessitate a systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in diagnosing cerebellar abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies on prenatal ultrasound for diagnosing cerebellar anomalies. Inclusion criteria included studies with clear diagnostic outcomes, diverse patient populations, and standardized ultrasound protocols. Meta-analytic techniques were employed to assess overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity using Meta Disk. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included fifteen studies involving 1,902 fetuses with suspected cerebellar abnormalities. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of prenatal ultrasound were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.96 (95% CI: 3.23-19.64), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09-0.36), and the odds ratio was 46.76 (95% CI: 14.06-155.53). The combined area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.93, indicating robust diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was observed, influenced by factors such as gestational age at screening, operator expertise, and ultrasound equipment quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prenatal ultrasound is a reliable tool for detecting cerebellar abnormalities with high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in diagnostic performance suggests the need for standardized protocols and advanced imaging techniques to enhance accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple imaging modalities to optimize prenatal screening outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2453997"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2453997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fetal cerebellar abnormalities are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and structural brain malformations. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for prenatal counseling and planning postnatal interventions. While prenatal ultrasound is a key tool for detecting fetal brain abnormalities, variations in diagnostic accuracy across studies necessitate a systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in diagnosing cerebellar abnormalities.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies on prenatal ultrasound for diagnosing cerebellar anomalies. Inclusion criteria included studies with clear diagnostic outcomes, diverse patient populations, and standardized ultrasound protocols. Meta-analytic techniques were employed to assess overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity using Meta Disk. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: The meta-analysis included fifteen studies involving 1,902 fetuses with suspected cerebellar abnormalities. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of prenatal ultrasound were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.96 (95% CI: 3.23-19.64), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09-0.36), and the odds ratio was 46.76 (95% CI: 14.06-155.53). The combined area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.93, indicating robust diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was observed, influenced by factors such as gestational age at screening, operator expertise, and ultrasound equipment quality.

Conclusions: Prenatal ultrasound is a reliable tool for detecting cerebellar abnormalities with high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in diagnostic performance suggests the need for standardized protocols and advanced imaging techniques to enhance accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple imaging modalities to optimize prenatal screening outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信