Fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique for difficult removal of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in children: a report of three cases and literature review.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
AME Case Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/acr-24-119
Rongwei Xu, Linna Tang, Minghai Wang, Shiyong Qin, Shuguang Zhang
{"title":"Fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique for difficult removal of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in children: a report of three cases and literature review.","authors":"Rongwei Xu, Linna Tang, Minghai Wang, Shiyong Qin, Shuguang Zhang","doi":"10.21037/acr-24-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In general, it is relatively easy to remove peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) by gentle traction without any complications. However, the removal of PICC can be challenging occasionally. If the standard interventions fail to remove the catheter, there are no clear recommendations about what to do. We presented three cases to explore fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique for removal of the firmly adherent PICC.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Three cases of difficult PICC removal were all children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). All cases were male, range 3-6 years, mean 5.00±1.73 years, catheter indwelling time 289-433 days, mean 367.33±72.83 days. All three cases underwent PICC intubation via the basilic vein approach and all catheters were 3.0 French (Fr), silicone, single-lumen PICCs (Bard Access Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Removal of the PICC at the end of the treatment course was difficult. The pullback of the catheter went smoothly for the first few centimeters, but then resistance was encountered. The catheter did not move backward at that point, although we applied strong continuous traction. Several noninvasive approaches to remove the catheter (e.g., repositioning of the extremity, application of hot compress, and vascular massage) were all with no success. Eventually, the firmly adherent PICC was removed using fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique in hybrid operating room safely and successfully.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Difficult PICC removal can result after prolonged dwell times. When conventional noninvasive interventions are unsuccessful, fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique is a safe and effective method for the removal of adherent PICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":29752,"journal":{"name":"AME Case Reports","volume":"9 ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AME Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acr-24-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In general, it is relatively easy to remove peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) by gentle traction without any complications. However, the removal of PICC can be challenging occasionally. If the standard interventions fail to remove the catheter, there are no clear recommendations about what to do. We presented three cases to explore fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique for removal of the firmly adherent PICC.

Case description: Three cases of difficult PICC removal were all children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). All cases were male, range 3-6 years, mean 5.00±1.73 years, catheter indwelling time 289-433 days, mean 367.33±72.83 days. All three cases underwent PICC intubation via the basilic vein approach and all catheters were 3.0 French (Fr), silicone, single-lumen PICCs (Bard Access Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Removal of the PICC at the end of the treatment course was difficult. The pullback of the catheter went smoothly for the first few centimeters, but then resistance was encountered. The catheter did not move backward at that point, although we applied strong continuous traction. Several noninvasive approaches to remove the catheter (e.g., repositioning of the extremity, application of hot compress, and vascular massage) were all with no success. Eventually, the firmly adherent PICC was removed using fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique in hybrid operating room safely and successfully.

Conclusions: Difficult PICC removal can result after prolonged dwell times. When conventional noninvasive interventions are unsuccessful, fluoroscopy-guided guidewire-assisted technique is a safe and effective method for the removal of adherent PICC.

透视引导下导丝辅助技术治疗儿童周围置管中心静脉导管(PICC)取出困难:附3例报告并文献复习。
背景:一般情况下,通过轻柔牵引将外周置管中心静脉导管(PICC)取出相对容易,且无并发症。然而,取消人保险偶尔也会有挑战。如果标准的干预措施不能移除导管,没有明确的建议做什么。我们报告了三个病例,探讨透视引导下导丝辅助技术去除牢固粘附的PICC。病例描述:3例PICC切除困难均为急性淋巴细胞白血病(all)患儿。所有病例均为男性,年龄范围3 ~ 6岁,平均5.00±1.73岁,留置时间289 ~ 433天,平均367.33±72.83天。所有3例患者均通过basilic静脉入路行PICC插管,所有导管均为3.0 French (Fr),硅胶,单腔PICC (Bard Access Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA)。在疗程结束时切除PICC是困难的。在最初的几厘米内,导管的回拉很顺利,但随后就遇到了阻力。尽管我们施加了持续的强力牵引,导管在那一点上并没有向后移动。几种非侵入性取管方法(如肢体复位、热敷和血管按摩)均未成功。最终在混合手术室采用透视引导下导丝辅助技术安全成功地切除了粘附牢固的PICC。结论:长时间停留可导致PICC难以清除。当传统的非侵入性干预不成功时,透视引导下的导丝辅助技术是一种安全有效的清除粘附PICC的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信