Postoperative Lung Function Advantages in Pulmonary Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ernesto Crisafulli, Claudio Micheletto, Alessio Campisi, Emanuele Vocale, Chiara Schiena, Giulia Sartori, Gianluca Gaburro, Elide Felici, Maurizio Infante
{"title":"Postoperative Lung Function Advantages in Pulmonary Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.","authors":"Ernesto Crisafulli, Claudio Micheletto, Alessio Campisi, Emanuele Vocale, Chiara Schiena, Giulia Sartori, Gianluca Gaburro, Elide Felici, Maurizio Infante","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In early-stage lung cancer, lung function appears to be less compromised after segmentectomy than lobectomy, though the advantage seems modest. We aimed to re-assess postoperative lung function in surgical patients, with a particular focus on the diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DL<sub>CO</sub>). We evaluated all patients who underwent either lobectomy or segmentectomy for T1a-c lung cancer at our center between March 2016 and March 2023. From January to June 2024, patients who had undergone segmentectomy, along with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone lobectomy, were invited for a repeat lung function evaluation. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, surgical approach, year in which the procedure was performed, and tumor location. Lung function testing data including DL<sub>CO</sub> were then compared to preoperative measures. During the study period, 480 patients received a lobectomy, and 97 received a segmentectomy. Complete lung function evaluation for the study was available for 52 patients (26 matched pairs). The median time from lung resection to repeat spirometry was 35 months. A modest reduction of lung function measures was observed in the segmentectomy group. Conversely, all lung function measures, including DL<sub>CO</sub>, were significantly impaired in the lobectomy group. In early-stage lung cancer, patients who perform segmentectomy demonstrated better long-term lung function preservation compared to those who underwent lobectomy. Whenever feasible, segmentectomy should be considered the procedure of choice for early-stage lung cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 2","pages":"e15515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early-stage lung cancer, lung function appears to be less compromised after segmentectomy than lobectomy, though the advantage seems modest. We aimed to re-assess postoperative lung function in surgical patients, with a particular focus on the diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). We evaluated all patients who underwent either lobectomy or segmentectomy for T1a-c lung cancer at our center between March 2016 and March 2023. From January to June 2024, patients who had undergone segmentectomy, along with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone lobectomy, were invited for a repeat lung function evaluation. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, surgical approach, year in which the procedure was performed, and tumor location. Lung function testing data including DLCO were then compared to preoperative measures. During the study period, 480 patients received a lobectomy, and 97 received a segmentectomy. Complete lung function evaluation for the study was available for 52 patients (26 matched pairs). The median time from lung resection to repeat spirometry was 35 months. A modest reduction of lung function measures was observed in the segmentectomy group. Conversely, all lung function measures, including DLCO, were significantly impaired in the lobectomy group. In early-stage lung cancer, patients who perform segmentectomy demonstrated better long-term lung function preservation compared to those who underwent lobectomy. Whenever feasible, segmentectomy should be considered the procedure of choice for early-stage lung cancer patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信