Electrical storm caused by sertraline overdose: case report.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
AME Case Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/acr-24-93
Vraj Patel, Mina Rismani, Fakhra Sultan, Amr Essa, Pascha Schafer
{"title":"Electrical storm caused by sertraline overdose: case report.","authors":"Vraj Patel, Mina Rismani, Fakhra Sultan, Amr Essa, Pascha Schafer","doi":"10.21037/acr-24-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cases of electrical storm, identifying the etiology is essential, as patients with reversible causes do not benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Given the diversity of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management tools available for hemodynamically unstable patients in electrical storm, all must be considered and tailored to each individual patient.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>This report describes a 36-year-old female without prior cardiac history who presented in ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. While she lacked significant electrolyte abnormalities or ischemia to explain etiology of electrical storm, she incidentally had variant coronary anatomy noted on angiography. After thorough consideration of possible etiologies of storm, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) intoxication was the most highly suspected etiology. Regarding management of her hemodynamically unstable electrical storm, she was treated with lidocaine, amiodarone, as well as mechanical circulatory support devices including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The patient ultimately was decannulated from ECMO, had IABP removal, and achieved recovery of ejection fraction (EF) to baseline. She was not offered ICD as the etiology of her cardiac arrest was reversable. She was discharged with recommendation to discontinue SSRI and follow up with psychiatry regarding SSRI overdose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of electrical storm etiology is crucial as reversible causes do not warrant ICD placement. Selection of appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management in the hemodynamically unstable electrical storm patient is important given the wide range of available options.</p>","PeriodicalId":29752,"journal":{"name":"AME Case Reports","volume":"9 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AME Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acr-24-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In cases of electrical storm, identifying the etiology is essential, as patients with reversible causes do not benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Given the diversity of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management tools available for hemodynamically unstable patients in electrical storm, all must be considered and tailored to each individual patient.

Case description: This report describes a 36-year-old female without prior cardiac history who presented in ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. While she lacked significant electrolyte abnormalities or ischemia to explain etiology of electrical storm, she incidentally had variant coronary anatomy noted on angiography. After thorough consideration of possible etiologies of storm, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) intoxication was the most highly suspected etiology. Regarding management of her hemodynamically unstable electrical storm, she was treated with lidocaine, amiodarone, as well as mechanical circulatory support devices including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The patient ultimately was decannulated from ECMO, had IABP removal, and achieved recovery of ejection fraction (EF) to baseline. She was not offered ICD as the etiology of her cardiac arrest was reversable. She was discharged with recommendation to discontinue SSRI and follow up with psychiatry regarding SSRI overdose.

Conclusions: Identification of electrical storm etiology is crucial as reversible causes do not warrant ICD placement. Selection of appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management in the hemodynamically unstable electrical storm patient is important given the wide range of available options.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信