Effectiveness of an External Cooling and Vibrating Device vs Counterstimulation in Reducing Discomfort of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Vandana Ponnan, Madhu Santhakumar, Anupam Kumar Thekke Veetil
{"title":"Effectiveness of an External Cooling and Vibrating Device vs Counterstimulation in Reducing Discomfort of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vandana Ponnan, Madhu Santhakumar, Anupam Kumar Thekke Veetil","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management in pediatric patients during dental procedures is very important. Here, the traditional method of behavior management is compared with novel methods.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare and determine the effectiveness of an external cooling and vibrating device vs counterstimulation with the conventional technique in reducing the fear and discomfort of pediatric dental patients aged 5-7 years during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study population consisted of children aged 5-7 years, rated as positive (+) or negative (-) on the Frankl behavior rating scale, who reported to the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry and required dental procedures in posterior teeth that warranted the use of IANB.Anxiety measurement was conducted by both objective and subjective means. The subjective measures included Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS), as chosen by the patient, and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC), as recorded by the observer, while the objective measure was pulse rate, recorded by a pulse oximeter.Group A: External cooling and vibrating device (Buzzy).Group B: Counterstimulation group.Group C: Control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WBFPRS score and FLACC score reduced following the intervention in the counterstimulation group, indicating a reduction in pain perception and anxiety compared to the application of Buzzy and the conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Counterstimulation was the most effective in reducing pain perception and anxiety during the administration of IANB.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The injection of local anesthetic remains one of the painful and fear-inducing procedures in pediatric dentistry. This study provides evidence that counterstimulation is effective in reducing pain perception and anxiety during the administration of IANB.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Ponnan V, Santhakumar M, Thekke Veetil AK. Effectiveness of an External Cooling and Vibrating Device vs Counterstimulation in Reducing Discomfort of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(12):1335-1339.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 12","pages":"1335-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain management in pediatric patients during dental procedures is very important. Here, the traditional method of behavior management is compared with novel methods.

Aim: To compare and determine the effectiveness of an external cooling and vibrating device vs counterstimulation with the conventional technique in reducing the fear and discomfort of pediatric dental patients aged 5-7 years during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).

Materials and methods: The study population consisted of children aged 5-7 years, rated as positive (+) or negative (-) on the Frankl behavior rating scale, who reported to the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry and required dental procedures in posterior teeth that warranted the use of IANB.Anxiety measurement was conducted by both objective and subjective means. The subjective measures included Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS), as chosen by the patient, and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC), as recorded by the observer, while the objective measure was pulse rate, recorded by a pulse oximeter.Group A: External cooling and vibrating device (Buzzy).Group B: Counterstimulation group.Group C: Control group.

Results: The WBFPRS score and FLACC score reduced following the intervention in the counterstimulation group, indicating a reduction in pain perception and anxiety compared to the application of Buzzy and the conventional technique.

Conclusion: Counterstimulation was the most effective in reducing pain perception and anxiety during the administration of IANB.

Clinical significance: The injection of local anesthetic remains one of the painful and fear-inducing procedures in pediatric dentistry. This study provides evidence that counterstimulation is effective in reducing pain perception and anxiety during the administration of IANB.

How to cite this article: Ponnan V, Santhakumar M, Thekke Veetil AK. Effectiveness of an External Cooling and Vibrating Device vs Counterstimulation in Reducing Discomfort of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(12):1335-1339.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信