Vaccination coverage and its determinants in patients with multiple sclerosis-a multicenter cross-sectional study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241309806
Paula Schade, Hai-Anh Nguyen, Julia Steinle, Kerstin Hellwig, Teodor Pelea, Philipp Franken, Birte Elias-Hamp, Veit Becker, Stefan Merkelbach, Stephan Richter, Bert Wagner, Christian Geis, Matthias Schwab, Florian Rakers
{"title":"Vaccination coverage and its determinants in patients with multiple sclerosis-a multicenter cross-sectional study.","authors":"Paula Schade, Hai-Anh Nguyen, Julia Steinle, Kerstin Hellwig, Teodor Pelea, Philipp Franken, Birte Elias-Hamp, Veit Becker, Stefan Merkelbach, Stephan Richter, Bert Wagner, Christian Geis, Matthias Schwab, Florian Rakers","doi":"10.1177/17562864241309806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete vaccination coverage is recommended by multiple sclerosis (MS) societies for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to mitigate infection risks associated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze vaccination coverage and its determinants in pwMS compared to healthy controls, considering vaccination hesitancy, MS-specific vaccination beliefs, trust in information sources, and the role of general practitioners (GPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional multicenter observational study was conducted in six German MS centers. The primary endpoint was a vaccination index (VI) comprising eight standard vaccinations (range 0-1, with higher VI indicating better vaccination coverage). Secondary endpoints included validated measures of general vaccination hesitancy, MS-specific vaccination beliefs, and trust in information sources. Data were collected through questionnaires, vaccination card analysis, and a survey of GPs who vaccinate pwMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VI tended to be lower in pwMS (<i>n</i> = 397) compared to healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 300; 0.58 ± 0.30 vs 0.62 ± 0.31, <i>p</i> = 0.057). In pwMS receiving highly effective DMTs, VI did not differ significantly from those on no/platform DMTs. Vaccination hesitancy was comparably low, with no differences between pwMS and controls. Vaccination hesitancy, beliefs, and trust in information sources explained only 10%-16% of the variance in VI. Among 109 GPs, 82% cited reluctance to vaccinate pwMS due to concerns about MS-related side effects or interactions with DMTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite clear recommendations from MS societies for full vaccination of all pwMS, vaccination coverage remains worryingly low. Approximately half of the patients lack standard vaccination coverage, even those on highly effective DMTs. In fact, vaccination coverage in pwMS tended to be even lower than in healthy controls. Vaccination hesitancy and other intrinsic factors do not sufficiently explain the low vaccination rates. Inconsistent vaccination recommendations from GPs due to uncertainties about vaccine safety and DMT interactions likely contribute.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864241309806"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241309806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complete vaccination coverage is recommended by multiple sclerosis (MS) societies for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to mitigate infection risks associated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

Objectives: To analyze vaccination coverage and its determinants in pwMS compared to healthy controls, considering vaccination hesitancy, MS-specific vaccination beliefs, trust in information sources, and the role of general practitioners (GPs).

Methods: This cross-sectional multicenter observational study was conducted in six German MS centers. The primary endpoint was a vaccination index (VI) comprising eight standard vaccinations (range 0-1, with higher VI indicating better vaccination coverage). Secondary endpoints included validated measures of general vaccination hesitancy, MS-specific vaccination beliefs, and trust in information sources. Data were collected through questionnaires, vaccination card analysis, and a survey of GPs who vaccinate pwMS.

Results: VI tended to be lower in pwMS (n = 397) compared to healthy controls (n = 300; 0.58 ± 0.30 vs 0.62 ± 0.31, p = 0.057). In pwMS receiving highly effective DMTs, VI did not differ significantly from those on no/platform DMTs. Vaccination hesitancy was comparably low, with no differences between pwMS and controls. Vaccination hesitancy, beliefs, and trust in information sources explained only 10%-16% of the variance in VI. Among 109 GPs, 82% cited reluctance to vaccinate pwMS due to concerns about MS-related side effects or interactions with DMTs.

Conclusion: Despite clear recommendations from MS societies for full vaccination of all pwMS, vaccination coverage remains worryingly low. Approximately half of the patients lack standard vaccination coverage, even those on highly effective DMTs. In fact, vaccination coverage in pwMS tended to be even lower than in healthy controls. Vaccination hesitancy and other intrinsic factors do not sufficiently explain the low vaccination rates. Inconsistent vaccination recommendations from GPs due to uncertainties about vaccine safety and DMT interactions likely contribute.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信