Immunobiologics in juvenile dermatomyositis: a systematic review of promising therapeutic advances.

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Reumatologia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.5114/reum/195799
Aline Maria de Oliveira Rocha, Gabriel Fidelis Ribeiro, Juliana Capecce Silva
{"title":"Immunobiologics in juvenile dermatomyositis: a systematic review of promising therapeutic advances.","authors":"Aline Maria de Oliveira Rocha, Gabriel Fidelis Ribeiro, Juliana Capecce Silva","doi":"10.5114/reum/195799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To identify the most effective treatment for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), considering efficacy, safety, impact on patients and improvement in their quality of life.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review was carried out comparing known treatments and immunobiological therapies, evaluating clinical improvement, adverse events and prognosis. The MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases were used with children aged 0 to 18 diagnosed with JDM. The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The immunobiologics studied were rituximab (RTX) and anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs and used the Disease Activity Score to skin, Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale and Manual Muscle Testing tools. There was no difference in the response when RTX was used (early or late). The anti-TNF studies were carried out in a population that was refractory to the initial treatment and showed a significant improvement in muscle and skin disease activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For severe or refractory disease, biologics tend to be the medication with the best therapeutic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":21312,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia","volume":"62 6","pages":"447-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/reum/195799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To identify the most effective treatment for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), considering efficacy, safety, impact on patients and improvement in their quality of life.

Material and methods: A systematic review was carried out comparing known treatments and immunobiological therapies, evaluating clinical improvement, adverse events and prognosis. The MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases were used with children aged 0 to 18 diagnosed with JDM. The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed throughout the process.

Results: The immunobiologics studied were rituximab (RTX) and anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs and used the Disease Activity Score to skin, Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale and Manual Muscle Testing tools. There was no difference in the response when RTX was used (early or late). The anti-TNF studies were carried out in a population that was refractory to the initial treatment and showed a significant improvement in muscle and skin disease activity.

Conclusions: For severe or refractory disease, biologics tend to be the medication with the best therapeutic response.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

免疫生物制剂在青少年皮肌炎:有前途的治疗进展的系统回顾。
目的:综合考虑疗效、安全性、对患者的影响以及对患者生活质量的改善,确定青少年皮肌炎(JDM)最有效的治疗方法。材料和方法:系统回顾比较已知治疗方法和免疫生物学治疗方法,评估临床改善、不良事件和预后。MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS和Cochrane图书馆数据库用于诊断为JDM的0至18岁儿童。整个过程遵循了PRISMA 2020声明。结果:研究的免疫生物学药物为利妥昔单抗(RTX)和抗肿瘤坏死因子药物,使用皮肤疾病活动度评分、儿童肌炎评估量表和手工肌肉测试工具。当使用RTX(早期或晚期)时,反应没有差异。抗肿瘤坏死因子研究是在对初始治疗难治的人群中进行的,并显示肌肉和皮肤疾病活动有显着改善。结论:对于严重或难治性疾病,生物制剂往往是治疗效果最好的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatologia
Reumatologia Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信