Exploring Barriers and Bridging Gaps: Perspectives of Nurses, Midwives, and Lady Health Workers in the Implementation of Emergency Obstetric Care.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fouzia Gul, Razia Mehsood, Shehla Noor
{"title":"Exploring Barriers and Bridging Gaps: Perspectives of Nurses, Midwives, and Lady Health Workers in the Implementation of Emergency Obstetric Care.","authors":"Fouzia Gul, Razia Mehsood, Shehla Noor","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.1.10269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Maternal mortality is a global concern primarily due to preventable obstetric complications. Challenges in implementing Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) in developing nations hinder effective reduction of these deaths. Our objective was to identify key challenges in EmOC practices among frontline healthcare providers, assess the severity and frequency of these barriers, and evaluate gaps in resources, training, and institutional support needed for effective resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed EmOC knowledge, practical skills, and challenges among Nurses, Lady Health Visitors (LHVs), and Lady Health Workers (LHWs) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan from July 2017-June 2020. Participants were conveniently sampled from hospitals across eight districts, with data collected through a questionnaire on EmOC knowledge, practical interventions, and challenges faced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although most participants (91% of nurses, 90.2% of LHVs, 92.3% of LHWs, and 83.3% of midwives) expressed satisfaction with course content, important gaps emerged in the practical application of specific EmOC interventions. Nurses displayed 79% knowledge of the Partogram with only 60% utilization, while LHVs showed 80.5% knowledge but just 50.2% utilization. Assisted delivery knowledge and practice were particularly low among nurses (32% & 7%) & LHVs (17.1% & 2.4%) respectively. Significant gaps were found in retained placenta removal and manual vacuum aspiration, with only 12% of nurses and 3% of LHVs practicing the latter, with no utilization among LHWs or midwives. Key barriers included insufficient training and restrictive institutional policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite high course content satisfaction, disparities in EmOC knowledge and practice persist among frontline healthcare-providers, with barriers like insufficient training and institutional limitations impacting maternal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.1.10269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Maternal mortality is a global concern primarily due to preventable obstetric complications. Challenges in implementing Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) in developing nations hinder effective reduction of these deaths. Our objective was to identify key challenges in EmOC practices among frontline healthcare providers, assess the severity and frequency of these barriers, and evaluate gaps in resources, training, and institutional support needed for effective resolution.

Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed EmOC knowledge, practical skills, and challenges among Nurses, Lady Health Visitors (LHVs), and Lady Health Workers (LHWs) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan from July 2017-June 2020. Participants were conveniently sampled from hospitals across eight districts, with data collected through a questionnaire on EmOC knowledge, practical interventions, and challenges faced.

Results: Although most participants (91% of nurses, 90.2% of LHVs, 92.3% of LHWs, and 83.3% of midwives) expressed satisfaction with course content, important gaps emerged in the practical application of specific EmOC interventions. Nurses displayed 79% knowledge of the Partogram with only 60% utilization, while LHVs showed 80.5% knowledge but just 50.2% utilization. Assisted delivery knowledge and practice were particularly low among nurses (32% & 7%) & LHVs (17.1% & 2.4%) respectively. Significant gaps were found in retained placenta removal and manual vacuum aspiration, with only 12% of nurses and 3% of LHVs practicing the latter, with no utilization among LHWs or midwives. Key barriers included insufficient training and restrictive institutional policies.

Conclusion: Despite high course content satisfaction, disparities in EmOC knowledge and practice persist among frontline healthcare-providers, with barriers like insufficient training and institutional limitations impacting maternal outcomes.

探索障碍,缩小差距:护士、助产士和女卫生工作者在实施产科急诊中的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信