Real-world single-center preliminary experience of radiofrequency balloon pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation

Q3 Medicine
Andrea Dell’Aquila , Carmelo La Greca , Amedeo Prezioso , Simone Zanchi , Joseph Antoine Kheir , Domenico Pecora
{"title":"Real-world single-center preliminary experience of radiofrequency balloon pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation","authors":"Andrea Dell’Aquila ,&nbsp;Carmelo La Greca ,&nbsp;Amedeo Prezioso ,&nbsp;Simone Zanchi ,&nbsp;Joseph Antoine Kheir ,&nbsp;Domenico Pecora","doi":"10.1016/j.ipej.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by percutaneous transcatheter ablation is its pivotal treatment. Nowadays, several techniques using different energy sources are used, such as radiofrequency (RF), cryoablation and laser ablation. A new technology that combines the strengths of different techniques has been developed, in particular having both the speed of one-shot techniques and the selectivity and precision of point-by-point RF: the RF balloon (RFB). Recent clinical studies<sup>1–3</sup> have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, with good results in terms of first pass isolation, procedural duration and fluoroscopy time. However, real-world data regarding RFB ablation is scarce, therefore with this study we aimed to describe the experience of our center with this technology (one of the first adopting it in our country). We prospectively enrolled in a single-center a total of 20 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation with RFB. The primary endpoint, i.e. PVI defined as stable absence of any electrical conduction from and into the veins, was met by 18 patient (90 %). Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 79 ± 30.68 min and and 15.36 ± 6.57 min, respectively, dwelling time was 30.3 ± 8.09 min. The only complication reported was a single case mild pericardial effusion 24 h after the procedure, likely of inflammatory nature, which was treated conservatively and resolved before discharge. With this study we demonstrated that PVI with RFB appears to be an effective and safe technique in a real world setting, with many upsides and a reduced atrial dwelling time that theoretically could reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. Further studies on larger number of patients are needed to confirm the results we obtained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35900,"journal":{"name":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629225000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by percutaneous transcatheter ablation is its pivotal treatment. Nowadays, several techniques using different energy sources are used, such as radiofrequency (RF), cryoablation and laser ablation. A new technology that combines the strengths of different techniques has been developed, in particular having both the speed of one-shot techniques and the selectivity and precision of point-by-point RF: the RF balloon (RFB). Recent clinical studies1–3 have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, with good results in terms of first pass isolation, procedural duration and fluoroscopy time. However, real-world data regarding RFB ablation is scarce, therefore with this study we aimed to describe the experience of our center with this technology (one of the first adopting it in our country). We prospectively enrolled in a single-center a total of 20 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation with RFB. The primary endpoint, i.e. PVI defined as stable absence of any electrical conduction from and into the veins, was met by 18 patient (90 %). Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 79 ± 30.68 min and and 15.36 ± 6.57 min, respectively, dwelling time was 30.3 ± 8.09 min. The only complication reported was a single case mild pericardial effusion 24 h after the procedure, likely of inflammatory nature, which was treated conservatively and resolved before discharge. With this study we demonstrated that PVI with RFB appears to be an effective and safe technique in a real world setting, with many upsides and a reduced atrial dwelling time that theoretically could reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. Further studies on larger number of patients are needed to confirm the results we obtained.
真实世界单中心射频球囊肺静脉消融治疗房颤的初步经验。
房颤(AF)是最常见的心律失常,经皮导管消融肺静脉隔离术(PVI)是房颤治疗的关键。目前,使用了几种不同能量源的技术,如射频(RF)、冷冻消融和激光消融。一种结合不同技术优势的新技术已经被开发出来,特别是具有一次性技术的速度和逐点射频的选择性和精度:射频气球(RFB)。最近的临床研究1-3证明了其有效性和安全性,在首次隔离、手术时间和透视时间方面都取得了良好的效果。然而,关于RFB消融的真实数据很少,因此,通过本研究,我们旨在描述本中心使用该技术的经验(我国最早采用该技术的中心之一)。我们前瞻性地在单中心招募了20例连续接受RFB房颤消融的患者。18例患者(90%)达到了主要终点,即PVI,其定义为稳定地没有任何电传导进出静脉。平均手术时间和透视时间分别为79±30.68 min和15.36±6.57 min,住院时间为30.3±8.09 min。术后24 h报告1例轻度心包积液,可能为炎症性,经保守治疗,出院前痊愈。通过这项研究,我们证明了PVI与RFB在现实世界中似乎是一种有效和安全的技术,具有许多优点,并且减少了心房停留时间,理论上可以降低血栓栓塞并发症的风险。需要对更多患者进行进一步的研究来证实我们获得的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal is a peer reviewed online journal devoted to cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Editorial Advisory Board includes eminent personalities in the field of cardiac pacing and electrophysiology from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信