Proton pump inhibitors and all-cause mortality risk among cancer patients.

IF 2.6 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Arunkumar Krishnan, Carolin Victoria Schneider, Declan Walsh
{"title":"Proton pump inhibitors and all-cause mortality risk among cancer patients.","authors":"Arunkumar Krishnan, Carolin Victoria Schneider, Declan Walsh","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v16.i1.99240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used, including among cancer patients, to manage gastroesophageal reflux and other gastric acid-related disorders. Recent evidence suggests associations between long-term PPI use and higher risks for various adverse health outcomes, including greater mortality.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between PPI use and all-cause mortality among cancer patients by a comprehensive analysis after adjustment for various confounders and a robust methodological approach to minimize bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the TriNetX research network, with electronic health records from multiple healthcare organizations. The study employed a new-user, active comparator design, which compared newly treated PPI users with non-users and newly treated histamine2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) users among adult cancer patients. Newly prescribed PPIs (esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, or rabeprazole) users were compared to non-users or newly prescribed H2RAs (cimetidine, famotidine, nizatidine, or ranitidine) users. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Each patient in the main group was matched to a patient in the control group using 1:1 propensity score matching to reduce confounding effects. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the follow-up period (median 5.4 ± 1.8 years for PPI users and 6.5 ± 1.0 years for non-users), PPI users demonstrated a higher all-cause mortality rate than non-users after 1 year, 2 years, and at the end of follow up (HRs: 2.34-2.72). Compared with H2RA users, PPI users demonstrated a higher rate of all-cause mortality HR: 1.51 (95%CI: 1.41-1.69). Similar results were observed across sensitivity analyses by excluding deaths from the first 9 months and 1-year post-exposure, confirming the robustness of these findings. In a sensitivity analysis, we analyzed all-cause mortality outcomes between former PPI users and individuals who have never used PPIs, providing insights into the long-term effects of past PPI use. In addition, at 1-year follow-up, the analysis revealed a significant difference in mortality rates between former PPI users and non-users (HR: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.82-1.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPI use among cancer patients was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-users or H2RA users. These findings emphasize the need for cautious use of PPIs in cancer patients and suggest that alternative treatments should be considered when clinically feasible. However, further studies are needed to corroborate our findings, given the significant adverse outcomes in cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"99240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i1.99240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used, including among cancer patients, to manage gastroesophageal reflux and other gastric acid-related disorders. Recent evidence suggests associations between long-term PPI use and higher risks for various adverse health outcomes, including greater mortality.

Aim: To investigate the association between PPI use and all-cause mortality among cancer patients by a comprehensive analysis after adjustment for various confounders and a robust methodological approach to minimize bias.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the TriNetX research network, with electronic health records from multiple healthcare organizations. The study employed a new-user, active comparator design, which compared newly treated PPI users with non-users and newly treated histamine2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) users among adult cancer patients. Newly prescribed PPIs (esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, or rabeprazole) users were compared to non-users or newly prescribed H2RAs (cimetidine, famotidine, nizatidine, or ranitidine) users. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Each patient in the main group was matched to a patient in the control group using 1:1 propensity score matching to reduce confounding effects. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: During the follow-up period (median 5.4 ± 1.8 years for PPI users and 6.5 ± 1.0 years for non-users), PPI users demonstrated a higher all-cause mortality rate than non-users after 1 year, 2 years, and at the end of follow up (HRs: 2.34-2.72). Compared with H2RA users, PPI users demonstrated a higher rate of all-cause mortality HR: 1.51 (95%CI: 1.41-1.69). Similar results were observed across sensitivity analyses by excluding deaths from the first 9 months and 1-year post-exposure, confirming the robustness of these findings. In a sensitivity analysis, we analyzed all-cause mortality outcomes between former PPI users and individuals who have never used PPIs, providing insights into the long-term effects of past PPI use. In addition, at 1-year follow-up, the analysis revealed a significant difference in mortality rates between former PPI users and non-users (HR: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.82-1.96).

Conclusion: PPI use among cancer patients was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-users or H2RA users. These findings emphasize the need for cautious use of PPIs in cancer patients and suggest that alternative treatments should be considered when clinically feasible. However, further studies are needed to corroborate our findings, given the significant adverse outcomes in cancer patients.

质子泵抑制剂与癌症患者全因死亡风险
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)广泛用于治疗胃食管反流和其他胃酸相关疾病,包括癌症患者。最近的证据表明,长期使用PPI与各种不良健康结果(包括更高的死亡率)的高风险之间存在关联。目的:通过各种混杂因素调整后的综合分析和最小化偏倚的稳健方法学方法,调查癌症患者使用PPI与全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用来自TriNetX研究网络的数据,以及来自多个医疗机构的电子健康记录。该研究采用新使用者、主动比较者设计,比较成人癌症患者中新治疗的PPI使用者与未治疗的PPI使用者和新治疗的组胺2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)使用者。新开ppi(埃索美拉唑、兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑或雷贝拉唑)使用者与未使用或新开H2RAs(西咪替丁、法莫替丁、尼扎替丁或雷尼替丁)使用者进行比较。主要结局为全因死亡率。采用1:1的倾向评分匹配,将主组的每位患者与对照组的每位患者进行匹配,以减少混杂效应。采用多变量Cox回归模型估计风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在随访期间(PPI使用者中位时间为5.4±1.8年,非PPI使用者中位时间为6.5±1.0年),PPI使用者在随访1年、2年和随访结束时的全因死亡率均高于非PPI使用者(hr: 2.34-2.72)。与H2RA使用者相比,PPI使用者表现出更高的全因死亡率(HR: 1.51) (95%CI: 1.41-1.69)。通过排除暴露后前9个月和1年的死亡,在敏感性分析中观察到类似的结果,证实了这些发现的稳健性。在敏感性分析中,我们分析了前PPI使用者和从未使用过PPI的个体之间的全因死亡率结果,为过去使用PPI的长期影响提供了见解。此外,在1年的随访中,分析显示前PPI使用者和非PPI使用者之间的死亡率有显著差异(HR: 1.84;95%置信区间:1.82—-1.96)。结论:与不使用或使用H2RA的患者相比,癌症患者使用PPI与更高的全因死亡率相关。这些发现强调了在癌症患者中谨慎使用质子泵抑制剂的必要性,并建议在临床可行时应考虑其他治疗方法。然而,考虑到癌症患者的显著不良后果,需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
585
期刊介绍: The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信