Beyond Food Assistance: A Scoping Review Examining Associations of Nonfood Social Safety Net Programs in the United States With Food Insecurity and Nutrition Outcomes.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Emily W Duffy, Mary Kathryn Poole, David Gonzalez, Joshua Petimar, Eliza W Kinsey, Paul R Shafer, Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle, Anna E Austin
{"title":"Beyond Food Assistance: A Scoping Review Examining Associations of Nonfood Social Safety Net Programs in the United States With Food Insecurity and Nutrition Outcomes.","authors":"Emily W Duffy, Mary Kathryn Poole, David Gonzalez, Joshua Petimar, Eliza W Kinsey, Paul R Shafer, Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle, Anna E Austin","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on associations between participation in nonfood social safety net programs (eg, income assistance, housing assistance) in the United States and food- and nutrition insecurity-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Food and nutrition insecurity are persistent public health challenges in the United States that increase chronic disease risk and exacerbate health disparities. Several food assistance programs enhance food and nutrition security. Nonfood social safety net programs, however, may also improve these outcomes by relieving households' financial strain. Understanding the scope of research on nonfood social safety net programs' associations with not only food insecurity but also nutrition insecurity is needed to understand their potential to reduce the burden of diet-related chronic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles. Articles were included if they were published between 1995 and 2023; conducted in the United States; available in English; included a dependent variable of food- and/or nutrition insecurity-related measures; and included an independent variable of participation in a federally funded, nonfood social safety net program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included articles (n = 65) reported on studies that examined 10 unique social safety net programs; 8 studies examined program interactions. Twenty studies focused on COVID-19 pandemic-era programs. Fifty-eight studies used food insecurity, food insufficiency, or food hardship as outcomes, and 11 studies used nutrition insecurity-related outcomes. Overall, results suggest that participation in nonfood social safety net programs is associated with reductions in food insecurity. Current evidence for an association between program participation and nutrition insecurity-related outcomes is limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research is warranted on the association between nonfood social safety net programs and nutrition insecurity; potential interactions between social safety net programs; associations between the expiration of pandemic-era programs and food and nutrition insecurity; and how program impacts might differ among populations with persistent disparities in food and nutrition insecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on associations between participation in nonfood social safety net programs (eg, income assistance, housing assistance) in the United States and food- and nutrition insecurity-related outcomes.

Background: Food and nutrition insecurity are persistent public health challenges in the United States that increase chronic disease risk and exacerbate health disparities. Several food assistance programs enhance food and nutrition security. Nonfood social safety net programs, however, may also improve these outcomes by relieving households' financial strain. Understanding the scope of research on nonfood social safety net programs' associations with not only food insecurity but also nutrition insecurity is needed to understand their potential to reduce the burden of diet-related chronic disease.

Methods: Six databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles. Articles were included if they were published between 1995 and 2023; conducted in the United States; available in English; included a dependent variable of food- and/or nutrition insecurity-related measures; and included an independent variable of participation in a federally funded, nonfood social safety net program.

Results: Included articles (n = 65) reported on studies that examined 10 unique social safety net programs; 8 studies examined program interactions. Twenty studies focused on COVID-19 pandemic-era programs. Fifty-eight studies used food insecurity, food insufficiency, or food hardship as outcomes, and 11 studies used nutrition insecurity-related outcomes. Overall, results suggest that participation in nonfood social safety net programs is associated with reductions in food insecurity. Current evidence for an association between program participation and nutrition insecurity-related outcomes is limited.

Conclusion: Further research is warranted on the association between nonfood social safety net programs and nutrition insecurity; potential interactions between social safety net programs; associations between the expiration of pandemic-era programs and food and nutrition insecurity; and how program impacts might differ among populations with persistent disparities in food and nutrition insecurity.

超越粮食援助:对美国非食品社会安全网计划与食品不安全和营养结果相关性的范围审查》(A Scoping Review Examining Associations of Nonfood Social Safety Net Programs With Food Insecurity and Nutrition Outcomes.
目的:开展一项范围审查,总结美国参与非食品社会安全网计划(如收入援助、住房援助)与食品和营养不安全相关结果之间关联的证据现状。背景:食品和营养不安全是美国持续存在的公共卫生挑战,增加了慢性病风险,加剧了健康差距。一些粮食援助项目加强了粮食和营养安全。然而,非食品社会安全网项目也可能通过缓解家庭的财务压力来改善这些结果。了解非食品社会安全网项目与粮食不安全以及营养不安全之间关系的研究范围,以了解它们在减少与饮食有关的慢性疾病负担方面的潜力。方法:系统检索6个数据库的同行评议文章。如果文章发表于1995年至2023年之间,则纳入其中;在美国进行的;有英文版本;纳入了食物和/或营养不安全相关措施的因变量;其中包括参与联邦资助的非食品社会安全网项目的自变量。结果:纳入的文章(n = 65)报告了10个独特的社会安全网项目的研究;8项研究考察了程序间的相互作用。20项研究的重点是COVID-19大流行时代的项目。58项研究使用粮食不安全、粮食不足或粮食困难作为结局,11项研究使用营养不安全相关结局。总体而言,结果表明,参与非食品社会安全网计划与减少粮食不安全有关。目前有关项目参与与营养不安全相关结果之间关联的证据有限。结论:非食品社会安全网项目与营养不安全之间的关系有待进一步研究;社会安全网项目之间潜在的相互作用;大流行时期计划的到期与粮食和营养不安全之间的联系;以及在粮食和营养不安全方面持续存在差异的人群中,项目的影响可能会有何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信