Maria Estibalez-Recasens, Carlos Serrano-Granger, Andrea Santamaría-Laorden, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Jaime Orejas-Pérez
{"title":"Precision of stereophotogrammetry in complete arch implant recordings: A clinical study.","authors":"Maria Estibalez-Recasens, Carlos Serrano-Granger, Andrea Santamaría-Laorden, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Jaime Orejas-Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Stereophotogrammetry has been proposed as an alternative to intraoral scanners for recording the location of multiple dental implants. Most studies evaluating its accuracy have been in vitro, and clinical studies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the precision of a stereophotogrammetry system for complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 10 participants with a completely edentulous maxilla with 6 multiunit implant abutments were recruited. For each participant, 5 recordings were made using a stereophotogrammetry device (PIC system; PIC dental). From the resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files, linear and angular Euclidean distances were recorded. A statistical analysis of the measurements obtained was used to determine their repeatability and to identify maximum discrepancy values. A comparative analysis of the standard deviation values was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Sidak statistical tests. (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For linear distances, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 14.71 ±12.2 µm, with a maximum discrepancy of 61 µm. For the angular measurements, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 0.072 ±0.064 degrees, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.345 degrees. Statistically significant differences (P<.05) were found among the different implant spans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggested that the stereophotogrammetry device was sufficiently precise for recording implant locations in complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implant abutments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem: Stereophotogrammetry has been proposed as an alternative to intraoral scanners for recording the location of multiple dental implants. Most studies evaluating its accuracy have been in vitro, and clinical studies are lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the precision of a stereophotogrammetry system for complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implants.
Material and methods: A total of 10 participants with a completely edentulous maxilla with 6 multiunit implant abutments were recruited. For each participant, 5 recordings were made using a stereophotogrammetry device (PIC system; PIC dental). From the resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files, linear and angular Euclidean distances were recorded. A statistical analysis of the measurements obtained was used to determine their repeatability and to identify maximum discrepancy values. A comparative analysis of the standard deviation values was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Sidak statistical tests. (α=.05).
Results: For linear distances, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 14.71 ±12.2 µm, with a maximum discrepancy of 61 µm. For the angular measurements, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 0.072 ±0.064 degrees, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.345 degrees. Statistically significant differences (P<.05) were found among the different implant spans.
Conclusions: The results suggested that the stereophotogrammetry device was sufficiently precise for recording implant locations in complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implant abutments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.