Effect of initial bone morphology on alveolar bone remodeling following molar extraction: A retrospective study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ren-Jie Lin, Anna Dai, Jia-Ping Huang, Meng Wang, Wen-Tao He, Pei-Hui Ding
{"title":"Effect of initial bone morphology on alveolar bone remodeling following molar extraction: A retrospective study.","authors":"Ren-Jie Lin, Anna Dai, Jia-Ping Huang, Meng Wang, Wen-Tao He, Pei-Hui Ding","doi":"10.1002/JPER.24-0342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical evidence about alveolar ridge changes following molar extraction and how the alveolar bone morphology influences the ridge dimensional changes remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 192 patients with 199 molar extractions were included in this retrospective study. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients were obtained 0-3 months pre extraction and 6-12 months post extraction. Outcome variables included the change rate in ridge height and width. The effect of morphology on the outcomes was explored by single-factor analysis, correlation analysis, and a multiple linear regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant resorption of alveolar bone occurred vertically and horizontally after molar extraction. Jaw, furcation involvement, number of roots, number of bone wall defects, extraction reasons, overall relative bone loss (RBL), bone height of the furcation region, thickness of the lingual/palatal wall, and height difference between buccal and lingual/palatal walls (|HB-HL|) were significantly correlated with the change in the height of the central alveolar bone (HC). The number of bone wall defects, overall RBL, and |HB-HL| were significantly correlated with horizontal width change. HC resorption was higher in sockets with |HB-HL| > 2.5 mm and overall RBL > 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The alveolar bone presented significant resorption after extraction. Anatomical characteristics affected the dimensions of the alveolar bone after molar extraction. When the initial overall RBL was severe or |HB-HL| was larger, the loss of alveolar bone dimensions was even more.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In recent years, it has been demonstrated that the local anatomical morphology of extraction sites may influence the process of alveolar bone remodeling. However, most studies have focused on the anterior teeth, with fewer investigations addressing molar extraction sites. Therefore, we aimed to describe ridge changes following molar extraction and investigate how alveolar bone morphology influences ridge dimensional changes. In this retrospective study, we included a total of 199 alveolar sockets from 192 patients with molar extractions and obtained the corresponding cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images 0-3 months pre extraction and 6-12 months post extraction. The results showed significant resorption of the alveolar bone following molar extraction. We found that anatomical characteristics significantly affect the dimensions of the alveolar bone after molar extraction. Specifically, the loss of alveolar bone dimensions was greater when the initial overall relative bone loss (RBL) was severe or when the difference between buccal and lingual/palatal walls was greater.</p>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.24-0342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical evidence about alveolar ridge changes following molar extraction and how the alveolar bone morphology influences the ridge dimensional changes remains limited.

Methods: A total of 192 patients with 199 molar extractions were included in this retrospective study. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients were obtained 0-3 months pre extraction and 6-12 months post extraction. Outcome variables included the change rate in ridge height and width. The effect of morphology on the outcomes was explored by single-factor analysis, correlation analysis, and a multiple linear regression model.

Results: Significant resorption of alveolar bone occurred vertically and horizontally after molar extraction. Jaw, furcation involvement, number of roots, number of bone wall defects, extraction reasons, overall relative bone loss (RBL), bone height of the furcation region, thickness of the lingual/palatal wall, and height difference between buccal and lingual/palatal walls (|HB-HL|) were significantly correlated with the change in the height of the central alveolar bone (HC). The number of bone wall defects, overall RBL, and |HB-HL| were significantly correlated with horizontal width change. HC resorption was higher in sockets with |HB-HL| > 2.5 mm and overall RBL > 50%.

Conclusions: The alveolar bone presented significant resorption after extraction. Anatomical characteristics affected the dimensions of the alveolar bone after molar extraction. When the initial overall RBL was severe or |HB-HL| was larger, the loss of alveolar bone dimensions was even more.

Plain language summary: In recent years, it has been demonstrated that the local anatomical morphology of extraction sites may influence the process of alveolar bone remodeling. However, most studies have focused on the anterior teeth, with fewer investigations addressing molar extraction sites. Therefore, we aimed to describe ridge changes following molar extraction and investigate how alveolar bone morphology influences ridge dimensional changes. In this retrospective study, we included a total of 199 alveolar sockets from 192 patients with molar extractions and obtained the corresponding cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images 0-3 months pre extraction and 6-12 months post extraction. The results showed significant resorption of the alveolar bone following molar extraction. We found that anatomical characteristics significantly affect the dimensions of the alveolar bone after molar extraction. Specifically, the loss of alveolar bone dimensions was greater when the initial overall relative bone loss (RBL) was severe or when the difference between buccal and lingual/palatal walls was greater.

磨牙拔牙后初始骨形态对牙槽骨重塑的影响:回顾性研究。
背景:关于臼齿拔牙后牙槽嵴变化的临床证据以及牙槽骨形态对牙槽嵴尺寸变化的影响仍然有限。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,对192例患者进行199次磨牙拔除。取拔牙前0 ~ 3个月及拔牙后6 ~ 12个月的锥形束ct (Cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT)图像。结果变量包括脊高和脊宽的变化率。通过单因素分析、相关分析和多元线性回归模型探讨形态学对预后的影响。结果:拔除磨牙后,牙槽骨在垂直方向和水平方向均有明显的吸收。下颌、分岔累及、根数、骨壁缺损数、拔牙原因、总体相对骨丢失(RBL)、分岔区骨高度、舌/腭壁厚度、颊/舌/腭壁高度差(|HB-HL|)与中央牙槽骨(HC)高度变化有显著相关。骨壁缺损数、总RBL、|HB-HL|与水平宽度变化显著相关。在| - hb| - > 2.5 mm和总体RBL > 50%的插槽中,HC吸收率较高。结论:拔牙后牙槽骨有明显的吸收。拔牙后牙槽骨的解剖特征影响牙槽骨的尺寸。当初始总体RBL严重或|HB-HL|较大时,牙槽骨尺寸的损失更大。摘要:近年来,研究表明拔牙部位的局部解剖形态可能影响牙槽骨重塑的过程。然而,大多数研究都集中在前牙上,很少有关于臼齿拔牙部位的研究。因此,我们的目的是描述磨牙拔牙后牙脊的变化,并研究牙槽骨形态如何影响牙脊尺寸的变化。在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了192例拔牙患者的199个牙槽口,并获得了拔牙前0-3个月和拔牙后6-12个月的相应锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。结果显示磨牙拔牙后牙槽骨有明显的吸收。我们发现解剖特征显著影响磨牙拔牙后牙槽骨的尺寸。具体来说,当初始总体相对骨质流失(RBL)严重或颊壁与舌壁/腭壁之间的差异较大时,牙槽骨尺寸的损失更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信