The Presence of a Shelter in an Open Field Test Has Differential Effects on the Behavior and Stress Response of Two Mouse Species

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Rita I. Monarca, Ricardo F. B. Silva, Sofia I. Gabriel, Ana M. Cerveira, Sophie von Merten
{"title":"The Presence of a Shelter in an Open Field Test Has Differential Effects on the Behavior and Stress Response of Two Mouse Species","authors":"Rita I. Monarca,&nbsp;Ricardo F. B. Silva,&nbsp;Sofia I. Gabriel,&nbsp;Ana M. Cerveira,&nbsp;Sophie von Merten","doi":"10.1002/jez.2904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The open field test (OFT) is frequently used in research to assess anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity. Its simple design can lead to the misconception that it is a standardized procedure comparable between laboratories. However, some modifications in the setup can cause changes in behavior. Different species might also react differently to the modifications introduced. There is thus need for a better understanding of the impact of modifications and their value for the species in question. Here, we tested two closely related mouse species, <i>Mus musculus</i> and <i>Mus spretus</i>, in an OFT with and without the presence of a shelter. We assessed mouse exploratory behavior through the analysis of multiple behavioral traits, and stress response through the measurement of circulating cortisol levels. Both species had elevated cortisol levels during the OFT in contrast to control animals which were not exposed to the OFT. While the presence of a shelter in the OFT increased the exploratory behavior in both mouse species, <i>M. spretus</i>, but not <i>M. musculus</i>, showed a reduction in cortisol levels. Also, other measured behaviors show a rather proactive coping strategy of the commensal <i>M. musculus</i> in contrast to a reactive strategy of the non-commensal <i>M. spretus</i>. Our study revealed a strong species-specific influence of the OFT design on the resulting behavior and stress levels of mice, illustrating the importance of OFT designs to account for the characteristics of the species under study. The addition of a shelter might be considered to improve experimental results by promoting animal welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":15711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology","volume":"343 4","pages":"480-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jez.2904","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jez.2904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The open field test (OFT) is frequently used in research to assess anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity. Its simple design can lead to the misconception that it is a standardized procedure comparable between laboratories. However, some modifications in the setup can cause changes in behavior. Different species might also react differently to the modifications introduced. There is thus need for a better understanding of the impact of modifications and their value for the species in question. Here, we tested two closely related mouse species, Mus musculus and Mus spretus, in an OFT with and without the presence of a shelter. We assessed mouse exploratory behavior through the analysis of multiple behavioral traits, and stress response through the measurement of circulating cortisol levels. Both species had elevated cortisol levels during the OFT in contrast to control animals which were not exposed to the OFT. While the presence of a shelter in the OFT increased the exploratory behavior in both mouse species, M. spretus, but not M. musculus, showed a reduction in cortisol levels. Also, other measured behaviors show a rather proactive coping strategy of the commensal M. musculus in contrast to a reactive strategy of the non-commensal M. spretus. Our study revealed a strong species-specific influence of the OFT design on the resulting behavior and stress levels of mice, illustrating the importance of OFT designs to account for the characteristics of the species under study. The addition of a shelter might be considered to improve experimental results by promoting animal welfare.

Abstract Image

在野外测试中,庇护所的存在对两种小鼠的行为和应激反应有不同的影响。
开放场测试(OFT)在研究中经常用于评估焦虑样行为和运动活动。其简单的设计可能会导致误解,认为它是实验室之间可比较的标准化程序。但是,设置中的一些修改可能会导致行为发生变化。不同的物种对引入的修饰也可能有不同的反应。因此,有必要更好地了解改造的影响及其对有关物种的价值。在这里,我们测试了两种密切相关的老鼠,小家鼠和小家鼠,在有和没有庇护所的OFT中。我们通过分析多种行为特征来评估小鼠的探索行为,并通过测量循环皮质醇水平来评估应激反应。与没有接触OFT的对照动物相比,这两个物种在OFT期间的皮质醇水平都有所升高。虽然OFT中庇护所的存在增加了两种小鼠的探索行为,但M. spretus而不是M. musculus显示出皮质醇水平的降低。此外,其他测量的行为表明,与非共生M. spretus的反应性策略相比,共生M. muscle具有相当主动的应对策略。我们的研究揭示了OFT设计对小鼠行为和应激水平的强烈的物种特异性影响,说明了OFT设计在考虑所研究物种特征方面的重要性。增加一个庇护所可以考虑通过促进动物福利来改善实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology
Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Zoology – A publishes articles at the interface between Development, Physiology, Ecology and Evolution. Contributions that help to reveal how molecular, functional and ecological variation relate to one another are particularly welcome. The Journal publishes original research in the form of rapid communications or regular research articles, as well as perspectives and reviews on topics pertaining to the scope of the Journal. Acceptable articles are limited to studies on animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信