The development and evaluation of nine obesity-based indices for gallstones in U.S. adults.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Xiaodong Wu, Yanhong Song, Shuodong Wu
{"title":"The development and evaluation of nine obesity-based indices for gallstones in U.S. adults.","authors":"Xiaodong Wu, Yanhong Song, Shuodong Wu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2348-2357"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Gallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.

Methods: Data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.

Results: In total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.

Conclusion: RFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.

美国成人胆结石的9个肥胖指标的发展和评价。
目的:胆结石已逐渐成为一种高度流行的消化道疾病。本研究旨在探讨9种不同的肥胖相关指标(BRI、RFM、BMI、WC、LAP、CMI、VAI、AIP、TyG)与胆结石的相关性,并比较它们对胆结石筛查的预测能力。方法:本研究数据来源于2017-2020年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES),采用多模型调整的加权logistic回归分析,探讨9项指标与胆结石的相关性。分析受试者工作曲线,评价9项指标的筛选能力。此外,最具预测性的指标与胆结石之间的关系通过光滑曲线拟合进行了研究,并通过亚组分析探讨了不同人群之间的风险差异。结果:共有3654名参与者参与最终分析,其中383名(10.48%)患有胆结石。加权多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,BRI、RFM、BMI、WC、LAP和CMI是胆结石的独立危险因素。RFM的最高四分位数的or值为4.13,BRI为3.13,BMI为2.85,WC为2.86,LAP为2.45,CMI为1.49。RFM的ROC曲线下面积为0.70。Delong检验比较了不同roc的表现,结果显示RFM曲线下面积与其他指标差异显著(P < 0.05)。平滑曲线拟合显示RFM与胆结石呈线性正相关(LLR 0.05),特别是在女性、非西班牙裔白人、运动不足、高血压和糖尿病人群中。结论:RFM、BRI、BMI、WC、LAP、CMI是识别胆结石的重要指标。通过比较,我们意识到RFM能更好地预测胆结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信