Small pulmonary nodule localization techniques in the era of lung cancer screening: a narrative review.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hao Zhang, Chi Zhang, Lin Li, Jun Qi, Guo-Huan Yang, Ying-Qiang Li, Chang-Qi Gong
{"title":"Small pulmonary nodule localization techniques in the era of lung cancer screening: a narrative review.","authors":"Hao Zhang, Chi Zhang, Lin Li, Jun Qi, Guo-Huan Yang, Ying-Qiang Li, Chang-Qi Gong","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread adoption of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) screening has led to increased detection of small pulmonary nodules, necessitating accurate localization techniques for surgical resection. This review examines the evolution, efficacy, and safety of various localization methods for small pulmonary nodules. Studies focusing on localization techniques for pulmonary nodules ≤30 mm in diameter were included, with emphasis on technical success rates and complication profiles. Preoperative CT-guided techniques, including hook-wire (success rate 94-98%) and anchored needle localization (success rate >99%, dislodgement rate 0%) demonstrate high technical success rates, though with varying complication profiles. Microcoil localization (97-98% success) shows comparable efficacy with lower complication rates. Dye-based methods offer simplicity but can be limited by rapid diffusion. Newer techniques like medical adhesive localization (success rate up to 100%) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (97.2% success) show promise in reducing complications and improving accuracy. Intraoperative methods such as ultrasound and hybrid operating room approaches provide real-time guidance but may be limited by nodule characteristics and available expertise. This review presents a radar chart analysis comparing techniques across key parameters and introduces an innovative decision-making algorithm that considers nodule characteristics, patient factors, and institutional resources, providing practical guidance and serving as a reference for clinicians. While no single method is universally superior, the trend towards minimally invasive, precise, and flexible approaches is evident. Future research should focus on large-scale comparative studies and the integration of artificial intelligence for optimized technique selection and improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2624-2632"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread adoption of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) screening has led to increased detection of small pulmonary nodules, necessitating accurate localization techniques for surgical resection. This review examines the evolution, efficacy, and safety of various localization methods for small pulmonary nodules. Studies focusing on localization techniques for pulmonary nodules ≤30 mm in diameter were included, with emphasis on technical success rates and complication profiles. Preoperative CT-guided techniques, including hook-wire (success rate 94-98%) and anchored needle localization (success rate >99%, dislodgement rate 0%) demonstrate high technical success rates, though with varying complication profiles. Microcoil localization (97-98% success) shows comparable efficacy with lower complication rates. Dye-based methods offer simplicity but can be limited by rapid diffusion. Newer techniques like medical adhesive localization (success rate up to 100%) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (97.2% success) show promise in reducing complications and improving accuracy. Intraoperative methods such as ultrasound and hybrid operating room approaches provide real-time guidance but may be limited by nodule characteristics and available expertise. This review presents a radar chart analysis comparing techniques across key parameters and introduces an innovative decision-making algorithm that considers nodule characteristics, patient factors, and institutional resources, providing practical guidance and serving as a reference for clinicians. While no single method is universally superior, the trend towards minimally invasive, precise, and flexible approaches is evident. Future research should focus on large-scale comparative studies and the integration of artificial intelligence for optimized technique selection and improved patient outcomes.

肺癌筛查时代的肺小结节定位技术述评。
高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)筛查的广泛采用导致小肺结节的检出率增加,需要精确的定位技术进行手术切除。本文综述了各种肺小结节定位方法的发展、疗效和安全性。本研究纳入了直径≤30mm肺结节定位技术的研究,重点是技术成功率和并发症概况。术前ct引导的技术,包括钩丝(成功率94-98%)和锚定针定位(成功率bbbb99 %,脱位率0%)显示了很高的技术成功率,尽管有不同的并发症。微线圈定位(97-98%的成功率)具有相当的疗效,并发症发生率较低。染料为基础的方法提供了简单性,但可能受到快速扩散的限制。较新的技术,如医用粘合剂定位(成功率高达100%)和电磁导航支气管镜检查(成功率97.2%)在减少并发症和提高准确性方面显示出希望。术中方法,如超声和混合手术室方法提供实时指导,但可能受到结节特征和现有专业知识的限制。本文综述了雷达图分析,比较了关键参数的技术,并介绍了一种创新的决策算法,该算法考虑了结节特征、患者因素和机构资源,为临床医生提供了实用指导和参考。虽然没有一种方法是普遍优越的,但微创、精确和灵活的方法的趋势是显而易见的。未来的研究应侧重于大规模的比较研究和人工智能的整合,以优化技术选择和改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信