Unveiling the landscape of antistigma interventions for individuals with substance use disorders: A scoping review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Abhishek Ghosh, Babita Sharma, Arshia Sood, Kshitiz Sharma
{"title":"Unveiling the landscape of antistigma interventions for individuals with substance use disorders: A scoping review.","authors":"Abhishek Ghosh, Babita Sharma, Arshia Sood, Kshitiz Sharma","doi":"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_770_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stigma against persons living with substance use disorders (PLSUD) fosters social and health inequities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to map different populations targeted by antistigma interventions, analyze specific characteristics of these interventions, and identify and categorize the theoretical frameworks used in these interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined randomized controlled trials and quasi or pre-experimental studies targeting stigma against PLSUD. Using two English databases, our analysis involved mapping study populations, antistigma interventions, and trial characteristics through a narrative synthesis. We adhered to the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) checklist for assessing reporting quality. The Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) identified intervention domains and constructs of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 698 studies, 29 met eligibility, with three from low-middle-income countries: 12 studies addressed the public, 11 self, and 5 structural stigmas. Reduction in stigma or improvements in knowledge of and attitude toward PLSUD was observed in 23 studies. Eight used social contact-based interventions, and one used direct social contact. Other interventions were psychoeducation, collaborative community care and linkage to social services, acceptance and commitment therapy, and gatekeepers' training. Five focused on injection drug use stigma; others were not substance-specific. Most studies reported the characteristics of the recipients (n = 28), mode of delivery (n = 28), and delivery settings (n = 24). Adherence to delivery protocol was the least reported (n = 5). The number of theoretical domains varied: 18 studies had 1-5 domains, 3 studies had 10, and 8 studies had 6-9 domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social contact-based interventions show promise for PLSUD; future research must improve the quality of reporting and design theory-informed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13345,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"66 12","pages":"1101-1123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_770_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stigma against persons living with substance use disorders (PLSUD) fosters social and health inequities.

Aim: We aimed to map different populations targeted by antistigma interventions, analyze specific characteristics of these interventions, and identify and categorize the theoretical frameworks used in these interventions.

Methods: We examined randomized controlled trials and quasi or pre-experimental studies targeting stigma against PLSUD. Using two English databases, our analysis involved mapping study populations, antistigma interventions, and trial characteristics through a narrative synthesis. We adhered to the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) checklist for assessing reporting quality. The Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) identified intervention domains and constructs of the interventions.

Results: Of 698 studies, 29 met eligibility, with three from low-middle-income countries: 12 studies addressed the public, 11 self, and 5 structural stigmas. Reduction in stigma or improvements in knowledge of and attitude toward PLSUD was observed in 23 studies. Eight used social contact-based interventions, and one used direct social contact. Other interventions were psychoeducation, collaborative community care and linkage to social services, acceptance and commitment therapy, and gatekeepers' training. Five focused on injection drug use stigma; others were not substance-specific. Most studies reported the characteristics of the recipients (n = 28), mode of delivery (n = 28), and delivery settings (n = 24). Adherence to delivery protocol was the least reported (n = 5). The number of theoretical domains varied: 18 studies had 1-5 domains, 3 studies had 10, and 8 studies had 6-9 domains.

Conclusion: Social contact-based interventions show promise for PLSUD; future research must improve the quality of reporting and design theory-informed interventions.

揭开针对药物使用障碍患者的反羞辱干预措施的面纱:范围综述。
背景:对物质使用障碍患者的污名化助长了社会和卫生不平等。目的:我们旨在绘制抗病耻感干预措施针对的不同人群,分析这些干预措施的具体特征,并确定和分类这些干预措施中使用的理论框架。方法:我们研究了针对PLSUD病耻感的随机对照试验和准或预实验研究。使用两个英文数据库,我们的分析包括绘制研究人群、抗病耻感干预和通过叙事综合的试验特征。我们遵循干预发展和评估研究工作组(WIDER)评估报告质量的检查表。理论领域框架(TDF)确定了干预领域和干预的结构。结果:在698项研究中,29项符合资格,其中3项来自中低收入国家:12项研究涉及公众,11项研究涉及自我,5项研究涉及结构性耻辱感。在23项研究中观察到耻辱感的减少或对PLSUD的知识和态度的改善。其中八个使用基于社会联系的干预措施,一个使用直接社会接触。其他干预措施包括心理教育、协作社区护理和与社会服务的联系、接受和承诺治疗以及看门人培训。5个重点关注注射吸毒的耻辱感;其他的则不是具体的。大多数研究报告了接受者的特征(n = 28)、分娩方式(n = 28)和分娩环境(n = 24)。遵守给药方案的报道最少(n = 5)。理论领域的数量各不相同:18项研究有1-5个领域,3项研究有10个领域,8项研究有6-9个领域。结论:以社会接触为基础的干预措施对PLSUD有帮助;未来的研究必须提高报告的质量,设计有理论依据的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Indian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (ISSN 0019-5545), is an official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society. It is published Bimonthly with one additional supplement (total 5 issues). The IJP publishes original work in all the fields of psychiatry. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication. The issues are published Bimonthly. An additional supplement is also published annually. Articles can be submitted online from www.journalonweb.com . The journal provides immediate free access to all the published articles. The journal does not charge the authors for submission, processing or publication of the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信