User-friendliness of the pain assessment in impaired cognition (PAIC15) in persons with aphasia: a pilot study.

IF 2.4 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Future Science OA Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1080/20565623.2025.2456440
Neeltje J de Vries, Hanneke J A Smaling, Jenny T van der Steen, Wilco P Achterberg
{"title":"User-friendliness of the pain assessment in impaired cognition (PAIC15) in persons with aphasia: a pilot study.","authors":"Neeltje J de Vries, Hanneke J A Smaling, Jenny T van der Steen, Wilco P Achterberg","doi":"10.1080/20565623.2025.2456440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with aphasia have difficulties communicating pain symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen observers performed multiple observations using the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC15) scale for persons with aphasia during rest and transfer in persons with aphasia. This pilot study examined the user-friendliness of PAIC15 and preference for type of self-report pain scales with a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PAIC15 was considered user-friendly for persons with aphasia: items were clear and not difficult to score. When self-report is possible, the combined scale with verbal, visual, and numerical elements is preferred for persons with aphasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAIC15 is a helpful instrument to aid clinical judgment and to screen for the presence of pain in persons with aphasia. There were mixed opinions, but most observers preferred to use the combined self-report scale for persons with aphasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12568,"journal":{"name":"Future Science OA","volume":"11 1","pages":"2456440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Science OA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2025.2456440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persons with aphasia have difficulties communicating pain symptoms.

Methods: Thirteen observers performed multiple observations using the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC15) scale for persons with aphasia during rest and transfer in persons with aphasia. This pilot study examined the user-friendliness of PAIC15 and preference for type of self-report pain scales with a questionnaire.

Results: The PAIC15 was considered user-friendly for persons with aphasia: items were clear and not difficult to score. When self-report is possible, the combined scale with verbal, visual, and numerical elements is preferred for persons with aphasia.

Conclusion: PAIC15 is a helpful instrument to aid clinical judgment and to screen for the presence of pain in persons with aphasia. There were mixed opinions, but most observers preferred to use the combined self-report scale for persons with aphasia.

失语症患者认知障碍疼痛评估的用户友好性(PAIC15):一项试点研究。
背景:失语症患者有疼痛症状难以沟通。方法:13名观察员采用认知障碍疼痛评估(PAIC15)量表对失语症患者休息和转移过程进行多重观察。本初步研究通过问卷调查的方式考察了PAIC15的用户友好性和对自述疼痛量表类型的偏好。结果:PAIC15量表对失语症患者使用方便,项目清晰,评分不难。当有自我报告的可能时,失语症患者更倾向于使用包含语言、视觉和数字元素的综合量表。结论:PAIC15是一种辅助临床判断和筛查失语症患者疼痛的有效工具。有不同的意见,但大多数观察员倾向于使用联合自我报告量表失语症的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future Science OA
Future Science OA MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Science OA is an online, open access, peer-reviewed title from the Future Science Group. The journal covers research and discussion related to advances in biotechnology, medicine and health. The journal embraces the importance of publishing all good-quality research with the potential to further the progress of research in these fields. All original research articles will be considered that are within the journal''s scope, and have been conducted with scientific rigour and research integrity. The journal also features review articles, editorials and perspectives, providing readers with a leading source of commentary and analysis. Submissions of the following article types will be considered: -Research articles -Preliminary communications -Short communications -Methodologies -Trial design articles -Trial results (including early-phase and negative studies) -Reviews -Perspectives -Commentaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信