Exploring the Implementation of Cognitive Screening in First-Episode Psychosis Settings: The CogScreen Implementation Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Dzenana Kartal, Marina Kunin, Jennifer Nicholas, Craig Hamilton, Desiree Smith, Mackenzie Murphy, Joshua Llerena, Lee Unsworth, Nicholas Cheng, Stephen C. Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Scott Richard Clark, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K. Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J. Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott
{"title":"Exploring the Implementation of Cognitive Screening in First-Episode Psychosis Settings: The CogScreen Implementation Study","authors":"Isabel Zbukvic,&nbsp;Evangeline Fisher,&nbsp;Alexandra Stainton,&nbsp;Shayden Bryce,&nbsp;Dzenana Kartal,&nbsp;Marina Kunin,&nbsp;Jennifer Nicholas,&nbsp;Craig Hamilton,&nbsp;Desiree Smith,&nbsp;Mackenzie Murphy,&nbsp;Joshua Llerena,&nbsp;Lee Unsworth,&nbsp;Nicholas Cheng,&nbsp;Stephen C. Bowden,&nbsp;Symphony Chakma,&nbsp;Scott Richard Clark,&nbsp;Shona Francey,&nbsp;Caroline Gao,&nbsp;Donna Gee,&nbsp;Elle Gelok,&nbsp;Anthony Harris,&nbsp;Lilianne Hatfield,&nbsp;Liza Hopkins,&nbsp;Rachel Morell,&nbsp;Chris O'Halloran,&nbsp;Scot Purdon,&nbsp;K. Oliver Schubert,&nbsp;Alana Scully,&nbsp;Hejun Tang,&nbsp;Adrian Thomas,&nbsp;Andrew Thompson,&nbsp;Jacqueline Uren,&nbsp;Stephen J. Wood,&nbsp;Wendi Zhao,&nbsp;Kelly Allott","doi":"10.1111/eip.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate and appropriate cognitive screening can significantly enhance early psychosis care, yet no screening tools have been validated for the early psychosis population and little is known about current screening practices, experiences, or factors that may influence implementation. CogScreen is a hybrid type 1 study aiming to validate two promising screening tools with young people with first episode psychosis (primary aim) and to understand the context for implementing cognitive screening in early psychosis settings (secondary aim). This protocol outlines the implementation study, which aims to explore the current practices, acceptability, feasibility and determinants of cognitive screening in early psychosis settings from the perspective of key stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Young people with first episode psychosis (<i>n</i> = 350), caregivers (minimum <i>n</i> = 10) and service providers (minimum <i>n</i> = 12) will be recruited from primary and specialist early psychosis services in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Two implementation science frameworks will inform data collection and analysis: the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A mixed-methods design will be employed to collect and analyse data from questionnaires with young people, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and administrative processes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed through content analysis using deductive and inductive coding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This protocol paper presents the rationale and methods for the CogScreen implementation study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Together with accuracy findings, results from the implementation study will provide insights about the practices, experiences, enablers and barriers to cognitive screening in early psychosis services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Accurate and appropriate cognitive screening can significantly enhance early psychosis care, yet no screening tools have been validated for the early psychosis population and little is known about current screening practices, experiences, or factors that may influence implementation. CogScreen is a hybrid type 1 study aiming to validate two promising screening tools with young people with first episode psychosis (primary aim) and to understand the context for implementing cognitive screening in early psychosis settings (secondary aim). This protocol outlines the implementation study, which aims to explore the current practices, acceptability, feasibility and determinants of cognitive screening in early psychosis settings from the perspective of key stakeholders.

Methods

Young people with first episode psychosis (n = 350), caregivers (minimum n = 10) and service providers (minimum n = 12) will be recruited from primary and specialist early psychosis services in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Two implementation science frameworks will inform data collection and analysis: the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A mixed-methods design will be employed to collect and analyse data from questionnaires with young people, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and administrative processes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed through content analysis using deductive and inductive coding.

Results and Discussion

This protocol paper presents the rationale and methods for the CogScreen implementation study.

Conclusion

Together with accuracy findings, results from the implementation study will provide insights about the practices, experiences, enablers and barriers to cognitive screening in early psychosis services.

Abstract Image

探索认知筛查在首发精神病中的实施:CogScreen实施研究。
目的:准确和适当的认知筛查可以显著提高早期精神病护理,但没有筛查工具已被证实为早期精神病人群,很少了解目前的筛查做法,经验,或因素可能影响实施。CogScreen是一项混合1型研究,旨在验证两种有前景的筛查工具,用于首发精神病的年轻人(主要目的),并了解在早期精神病环境中实施认知筛查的背景(次要目的)。本协议概述了实施研究,旨在从关键利益相关者的角度探讨早期精神病环境中认知筛查的当前做法、可接受性、可行性和决定因素。方法:从澳大利亚墨尔本、阿德莱德和悉尼的初级和专科早期精神病服务机构招募首发精神病的年轻人(n = 350)、护理人员(最少n = 10)和服务提供者(最少n = 12)。两个实施科学框架将为数据收集和分析提供信息:可接受性理论框架和实施研究综合框架。将采用混合方法设计收集和分析来自年轻人问卷调查、所有利益相关者群体访谈和行政程序的数据。定量数据将使用描述性统计进行分析。定性数据将通过使用演绎和归纳编码的内容分析进行分析。结果和讨论:本协议文件介绍了CogScreen实施研究的基本原理和方法。结论:结合准确性发现,实施研究的结果将为早期精神病服务中认知筛查的实践、经验、推动因素和障碍提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信