Does increasing the resistance-training volume lead to greater gains? The effects of weekly set progressions on muscular adaptations in females.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2459003
Alysson Enes, Camila L Correa, Mauro F Bernardo, Guilherme Nass Salles, Gustavo Oneda, Danilo F Leonel, Steven J Fleck, Stuart M Phillips, Eduardo O De Souza, Tácito P Souza-Junior
{"title":"Does increasing the resistance-training volume lead to greater gains? The effects of weekly set progressions on muscular adaptations in females.","authors":"Alysson Enes, Camila L Correa, Mauro F Bernardo, Guilherme Nass Salles, Gustavo Oneda, Danilo F Leonel, Steven J Fleck, Stuart M Phillips, Eduardo O De Souza, Tácito P Souza-Junior","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2459003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the effect of increasing the number of sets per week every fortnight versus performing a constant set volume on muscular adaptations over 12 weeks. Thirty females (RT experience 2.1 ± 1.0 years) were randomly assigned to a constant group (CG, <i>n</i> = 9) that performed 22 sets per week, a two-set progression group (2SG, <i>n</i> = 11), or a four-set progression group (4SG, <i>n</i> = 10). Forty-five degree leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM), vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (VL-CSA), and the sum of proximal, middle and distal lateral thigh muscle thickness (∑MT) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. We observed that the 4SG and 2SG conditions showed greater improvements in 1RM than the CG (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.032, respectively), with no differences between 4SG and 2SG (<i>p</i> = 0.118). Regarding VL-CSA, the 4SG group showed greater increases than the CG (<i>p</i> = 0.029) but not than the 2SG (<i>p</i> = 0.263), whereas no differences between the 2SG and CG (<i>p</i> = 0.443) were observed. There were no differences between groups for ∑MT (<i>p</i> = 0.783). While all groups demonstrated improvements in the measured outcomes, our findings suggest that increasing weekly sets may offer additional benefits for 1RM and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area. However, no additional benefits were observed for ∑MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"381-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2459003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the effect of increasing the number of sets per week every fortnight versus performing a constant set volume on muscular adaptations over 12 weeks. Thirty females (RT experience 2.1 ± 1.0 years) were randomly assigned to a constant group (CG, n = 9) that performed 22 sets per week, a two-set progression group (2SG, n = 11), or a four-set progression group (4SG, n = 10). Forty-five degree leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM), vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (VL-CSA), and the sum of proximal, middle and distal lateral thigh muscle thickness (∑MT) were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. We observed that the 4SG and 2SG conditions showed greater improvements in 1RM than the CG (p < 0.001, p = 0.032, respectively), with no differences between 4SG and 2SG (p = 0.118). Regarding VL-CSA, the 4SG group showed greater increases than the CG (p = 0.029) but not than the 2SG (p = 0.263), whereas no differences between the 2SG and CG (p = 0.443) were observed. There were no differences between groups for ∑MT (p = 0.783). While all groups demonstrated improvements in the measured outcomes, our findings suggest that increasing weekly sets may offer additional benefits for 1RM and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area. However, no additional benefits were observed for ∑MT.

增加阻力训练量会带来更大的收益吗?每周训练对女性肌肉适应的影响。
我们研究了每两周增加一组的数量与在12周内进行固定的训练量对肌肉适应的影响。30名女性(RT经验为2.1±1.0年)被随机分为每周进行22组的固定组(CG, n = 9)、两组进展组(2SG, n = 11)或四组进展组(4SG, n = 10)。在基线和干预后评估45度腿压一次重复最大值(1RM)、股外侧肌横截面积(VL-CSA)和大腿近、中、远外侧肌厚度之和(∑MT)。我们观察到4SG和2SG组在1RM方面的改善比CG组更大(p = 0.032),而4SG和2SG组之间没有差异(p = 0.118)。在VL-CSA方面,4SG组比CG组增加(p = 0.029),但比2SG组增加(p = 0.263),而2SG组与CG组无差异(p = 0.443)。∑MT组间差异不显著(p = 0.783)。虽然所有组的测量结果都有所改善,但我们的研究结果表明,增加每周的训练次数可能会对1RM和股外侧肌横截面积有额外的好处。然而,没有观察到∑MT的额外效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信