Youngjun Lee , Wikum R. Bandara , Sangjun Park , Miran Lee , Choongboem Seo , Sunwoo Yang , Kenneth J. Lim , Sharon M. Moe , Stuart J. Warden , Rachel K. Surowiec
{"title":"Integrating deep learning and machine learning for improved CKD-related cortical bone assessment in HRpQCT images: A pilot study","authors":"Youngjun Lee , Wikum R. Bandara , Sangjun Park , Miran Lee , Choongboem Seo , Sunwoo Yang , Kenneth J. Lim , Sharon M. Moe , Stuart J. Warden , Rachel K. Surowiec","doi":"10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) offers detailed bone geometry and microarchitecture assessment, including cortical porosity, but assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD) bone images remains challenging. This proof-of-concept study merges deep learning and machine learning to 1) improve automatic segmentation, particularly in cases with severe cortical porosity and trabeculated endosteal surfaces, and 2) maximize image information using machine learning feature extraction to classify CKD-related skeletal abnormalities, surpassing conventional DXA and CT measures.</div><div>We included 30 individuals (20 non-CKD, 10 stage 3 to 5D CKD) who underwent HRpQCT of the distal and diaphyseal radius and tibia and contributed data to develop and validate four different AI models for each anatomical site. Manually annotated cortical bone was used to train each segmentation deep-learning model. Textural features were extracted via Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and classified as CKD or non-CKD using XGBoost with each segmentation model. For comparison, manufacturer-supplied segmentation was used to extract cortical geometry, microarchitecture, and finite element analysis (FEA) outcomes. Model performance was confirmed using the test dataset and a separate independent validation cohort which included HRpQCT imaging from 42 additional individuals (18 non-CKD, 24 CKD stage 5D).</div><div>For segmentation, the diaphyseal location showed strong performance on test datasets, with Mean IoUs of 0.96 and 0.95, and accuracies of 0.97 for both radius and tibia sites in CKD. Model 4 developed from the diaphyseal tibia region excelled in classifying test and independent validation datasets, achieving F1 scores of 0.99 and 0.96, AUCs of 0.99 and 0.94, sensitivities of 0.99, and specificities of 0.99 and 0.92. No single parameter, including BMD and cortical porosity, among conventional CT outcomes consistently differentiated CKD from non-CKD across all anatomical sites.</div><div>Integrating HRpQCT with deep and machine learning, this innovative approach enables precise automatic segmentation of severely deteriorated endocortical surfaces and enhances sensitivity to CKD-related cortical bone changes compared to standard DXA and HRpQCT outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9043,"journal":{"name":"Bone Reports","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187224000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) offers detailed bone geometry and microarchitecture assessment, including cortical porosity, but assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD) bone images remains challenging. This proof-of-concept study merges deep learning and machine learning to 1) improve automatic segmentation, particularly in cases with severe cortical porosity and trabeculated endosteal surfaces, and 2) maximize image information using machine learning feature extraction to classify CKD-related skeletal abnormalities, surpassing conventional DXA and CT measures.
We included 30 individuals (20 non-CKD, 10 stage 3 to 5D CKD) who underwent HRpQCT of the distal and diaphyseal radius and tibia and contributed data to develop and validate four different AI models for each anatomical site. Manually annotated cortical bone was used to train each segmentation deep-learning model. Textural features were extracted via Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and classified as CKD or non-CKD using XGBoost with each segmentation model. For comparison, manufacturer-supplied segmentation was used to extract cortical geometry, microarchitecture, and finite element analysis (FEA) outcomes. Model performance was confirmed using the test dataset and a separate independent validation cohort which included HRpQCT imaging from 42 additional individuals (18 non-CKD, 24 CKD stage 5D).
For segmentation, the diaphyseal location showed strong performance on test datasets, with Mean IoUs of 0.96 and 0.95, and accuracies of 0.97 for both radius and tibia sites in CKD. Model 4 developed from the diaphyseal tibia region excelled in classifying test and independent validation datasets, achieving F1 scores of 0.99 and 0.96, AUCs of 0.99 and 0.94, sensitivities of 0.99, and specificities of 0.99 and 0.92. No single parameter, including BMD and cortical porosity, among conventional CT outcomes consistently differentiated CKD from non-CKD across all anatomical sites.
Integrating HRpQCT with deep and machine learning, this innovative approach enables precise automatic segmentation of severely deteriorated endocortical surfaces and enhances sensitivity to CKD-related cortical bone changes compared to standard DXA and HRpQCT outcomes.
Bone ReportsMedicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
Bone Reports is an interdisciplinary forum for the rapid publication of Original Research Articles and Case Reports across basic, translational and clinical aspects of bone and mineral metabolism. The journal publishes papers that are scientifically sound, with the peer review process focused principally on verifying sound methodologies, and correct data analysis and interpretation. We welcome studies either replicating or failing to replicate a previous study, and null findings. We fulfil a critical and current need to enhance research by publishing reproducibility studies and null findings.