Anatomical Predictors of Access-Related Vascular Complications Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31422

Gökhan Demirci, Serkan Aslan, Ahmet Anıl Şahin, Ali R Demir, Yunus Emre Erata, İrem Türkmen, Mehmet Kanyılmaz, Aysel Türkvatan, Mehmet Ertürk

{"title":"Anatomical Predictors of Access-Related Vascular Complications Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.","authors":"Gökhan Demirci, Serkan Aslan, Ahmet Anıl Şahin, Ali R Demir, Yunus Emre Erata, İrem Türkmen, Mehmet Kanyılmaz, Aysel Türkvatan, Mehmet Ertürk","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Access-related vascular complications (VCs) after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are associated with poor clinical outcomes and remain a significant challenge despite technological advances. The aim of this study was to identify anatomic predictors of access-related VCs after TAVR on preprocedural contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).Aims: The aim of this study was to identify anatomical predictors of access-related VCs after TAVR on preprocedural contrast-enhanced MDCT.Methods: A total of 348 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe AS who underwent transfemoral TAVR were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of minor and major access site complications as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria. The study population was divided into two groups according to the VC including VC (+) and VC (-).Results: A total of 101 patients (29%) developed VC (8.7% major, 20.3% minor) following TAVR. Regression analysis identified severe CFA calcification (p = 0.004), CFA depth (p < 0.001), minimum CFA diameter (p < 0.001), CFA depth-to-diameter ratio ≥ 5.6 (p < 0.001), and sheath-to-femoral artery ratio (SFAR) (p < 0.001) as significant predictors of VC. ROC curves generated for the occurrence of VC, the AUC for the femoral artery depth-to-diameter ratio (0.720) was higher than the AUC for the SFAR and the depth of the femoral artery (0.636, 0.630).Conclusion: Complications related to vascular access sites continue to be a significant concern for patients undergoing TF-TAVR. The CFA depth-to-diameter ratio has demonstrated superior predictive performance for VC compared to SFAR as expressed in the literature. Utilizing this criterion may enhance risk stratification for VC in high-risk patients, potentially reducing associated morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access-related vascular complications (VCs) after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are associated with poor clinical outcomes and remain a significant challenge despite technological advances. The aim of this study was to identify anatomic predictors of access-related VCs after TAVR on preprocedural contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Aims: The aim of this study was to identify anatomical predictors of access-related VCs after TAVR on preprocedural contrast-enhanced MDCT.

Methods: A total of 348 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe AS who underwent transfemoral TAVR were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of minor and major access site complications as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria. The study population was divided into two groups according to the VC including VC (+) and VC (-).

Results: A total of 101 patients (29%) developed VC (8.7% major, 20.3% minor) following TAVR. Regression analysis identified severe CFA calcification (p = 0.004), CFA depth (p < 0.001), minimum CFA diameter (p < 0.001), CFA depth-to-diameter ratio ≥ 5.6 (p < 0.001), and sheath-to-femoral artery ratio (SFAR) (p < 0.001) as significant predictors of VC. ROC curves generated for the occurrence of VC, the AUC for the femoral artery depth-to-diameter ratio (0.720) was higher than the AUC for the SFAR and the depth of the femoral artery (0.636, 0.630).

Conclusion: Complications related to vascular access sites continue to be a significant concern for patients undergoing TF-TAVR. The CFA depth-to-diameter ratio has demonstrated superior predictive performance for VC compared to SFAR as expressed in the literature. Utilizing this criterion may enhance risk stratification for VC in high-risk patients, potentially reducing associated morbidity and mortality.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

8.70%

发文量

419

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.