POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma: Clinical and genomic landscape from a large prospective single-center cohort

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35731
Camilla Nero MD, PhD, Rita Trozzi MD, Federica Persiani MSc, Simone Rossi MSc, Luca Mastrantoni MD, Simona Duranti MD, Floriana Camarda MD, Ilenia Marino PharmD, Luciano Giacò PhD, Tina Pasciuto EngD, PhD, Maria De Bonis PhD, Martina Rinelli PhD, Emanuele Perrone MD, Flavia Giacomini PharmD, Domenica Lorusso MD, PhD, Alessia Piermattei MSc, Gianfranco Zannoni MD, PhD, Francesco Fanfani MD, PhD, Giovanni Scambia MD, Angelo Minucci PhD
{"title":"POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma: Clinical and genomic landscape from a large prospective single-center cohort","authors":"Camilla Nero MD, PhD,&nbsp;Rita Trozzi MD,&nbsp;Federica Persiani MSc,&nbsp;Simone Rossi MSc,&nbsp;Luca Mastrantoni MD,&nbsp;Simona Duranti MD,&nbsp;Floriana Camarda MD,&nbsp;Ilenia Marino PharmD,&nbsp;Luciano Giacò PhD,&nbsp;Tina Pasciuto EngD, PhD,&nbsp;Maria De Bonis PhD,&nbsp;Martina Rinelli PhD,&nbsp;Emanuele Perrone MD,&nbsp;Flavia Giacomini PharmD,&nbsp;Domenica Lorusso MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alessia Piermattei MSc,&nbsp;Gianfranco Zannoni MD, PhD,&nbsp;Francesco Fanfani MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giovanni Scambia MD,&nbsp;Angelo Minucci PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To date, 11 DNA polymerase epsilon (<i>POLE</i>) pathogenic variants have been declared “hotspot” mutations. Patients with endometrial cancer (EC) characterized by <i>POLE</i> hotspot mutations (<i>POLE</i>mut) have exceptional survival outcomes. Whereas international guidelines encourage deescalation of adjuvant treatment in early-stage <i>POLE</i>mut EC, data regarding safety in <i>POLE</i>mut patients with unfavorable characteristics are still under investigation. On the other hand, the spread of comprehensive genome profiling programs has underscored the need to interpret <i>POLE</i> variants not considered to be hotspots.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of 596 sequenced patients with EC. The genomic landscape of <i>POLE</i>mut EC was compared with cases harboring nonhotspot <i>POLE</i> mutations within the exonuclease domain. Additionally, the genomic characteristics of multiple classifiers, as well as those exhibiting unfavorable histopathological and clinical features, were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant genomic differences were observed among patients with <i>POLE</i>mut EC when comparing multiple classifiers to not-multiple classifiers or those with unfavorable clinical features. However, the tumor mutational burden differed in both comparisons, whereas the percentage of C&gt;G mutations only differed in the comparison based on clinical features. Specific <i>POLE</i> mutations, even if not considered to be hotspots, have genomic features comparable to <i>POLE</i>mut.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present findings confirm the absence of significant genomic differences among <i>POLE</i>mut patients regardless of multiple-classifier status or association with high-risk clinical features. Prognostic data will be essential to elucidate the clinical significance of <i>POLE</i> mutations not classified as hotspots that exhibit genomic characteristics similar to those in <i>POLE</i>mut patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To date, 11 DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) pathogenic variants have been declared “hotspot” mutations. Patients with endometrial cancer (EC) characterized by POLE hotspot mutations (POLEmut) have exceptional survival outcomes. Whereas international guidelines encourage deescalation of adjuvant treatment in early-stage POLEmut EC, data regarding safety in POLEmut patients with unfavorable characteristics are still under investigation. On the other hand, the spread of comprehensive genome profiling programs has underscored the need to interpret POLE variants not considered to be hotspots.

Methods

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of 596 sequenced patients with EC. The genomic landscape of POLEmut EC was compared with cases harboring nonhotspot POLE mutations within the exonuclease domain. Additionally, the genomic characteristics of multiple classifiers, as well as those exhibiting unfavorable histopathological and clinical features, were examined.

Results

No significant genomic differences were observed among patients with POLEmut EC when comparing multiple classifiers to not-multiple classifiers or those with unfavorable clinical features. However, the tumor mutational burden differed in both comparisons, whereas the percentage of C>G mutations only differed in the comparison based on clinical features. Specific POLE mutations, even if not considered to be hotspots, have genomic features comparable to POLEmut.

Conclusions

The present findings confirm the absence of significant genomic differences among POLEmut patients regardless of multiple-classifier status or association with high-risk clinical features. Prognostic data will be essential to elucidate the clinical significance of POLE mutations not classified as hotspots that exhibit genomic characteristics similar to those in POLEmut patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

子宫内膜癌的极点突变:来自大型前瞻性单中心队列的临床和基因组景观。
背景:迄今为止,11个DNA聚合酶epsilon (POLE)致病变异已被宣布为“热点”突变。以极点热点突变(POLEmut)为特征的子宫内膜癌(EC)患者具有特殊的生存结果。尽管国际指南鼓励降低早期POLEmut EC的辅助治疗,但关于具有不利特征的POLEmut患者的安全性数据仍在调查中。另一方面,全面的基因组分析程序的传播强调了解释不被认为是热点的POLE变异的必要性。方法:本研究对596例经测序的EC患者进行了综合分析。将POLEmut EC的基因组景观与在外切酶结构域中具有非热点POLE突变的病例进行了比较。此外,多种分类的基因组特征,以及那些表现出不利的组织病理学和临床特征,进行了检查。结果:POLEmut EC患者在多分类器与非多分类器或具有不良临床特征的患者中没有观察到显著的基因组差异。然而,两种比较的肿瘤突变负担不同,而C b> G突变的百分比仅在基于临床特征的比较中有所不同。特定的极点突变,即使不被认为是热点,也具有与POLEmut相当的基因组特征。结论:目前的研究结果证实,无论多分类器状态或与高危临床特征的关联如何,POLEmut患者之间都没有显着的基因组差异。预后数据对于阐明未被归类为热点的POLE突变的临床意义至关重要,这些突变表现出与POLEmut患者相似的基因组特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信