Cohort profile: the provincial opioid agonist treatment cohort in Ontario, Canada

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kristen A. Morin, Mark R. Tatangelo, Shreedhar Acharya, David C. Marsh
{"title":"Cohort profile: the provincial opioid agonist treatment cohort in Ontario, Canada","authors":"Kristen A. Morin, Mark R. Tatangelo, Shreedhar Acharya, David C. Marsh","doi":"10.1007/s10654-025-01202-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) is the most effective intervention for opioid use disorder (OUD), but retention has decreased due to increasingly potent drugs like fentanyl. This cohort can be used retrospectively to observe trends in service utilization, healthcare integration, healthcare costs and patient outcomes. It also facilitates the design of observational studies to mimic a prospective design.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study used linked administrative data from ICES to create a cohort of 137,035 individuals who received at least one prescription of methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 2014 and 2022. Data were linked using de-identified personal health numbers. Variables included age, sex, rurality, income, homelessness, and mental health conditions. Regional differences in OAT use, retention, and mortality were analyzed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the cohort, 56.1% began OAT after 2014. Southern Ontario participants more often started on methadone (53.2%), while Northern Ontario patients favored buprenorphine/naloxone (62.7%). Northern patients were younger, more likely to be female, live in rural areas, and face homelessness. The death rate was higher in Southern Ontario (22.1%) than in Northern Ontario (13.2%). Retention declined over time, with 73.4% of patients remaining in treatment at the study's end.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The findings highlight regional disparities in OAT delivery and emphasize the need for region-specific strategies, particularly in rural areas, to improve retention and reduce mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01202-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) is the most effective intervention for opioid use disorder (OUD), but retention has decreased due to increasingly potent drugs like fentanyl. This cohort can be used retrospectively to observe trends in service utilization, healthcare integration, healthcare costs and patient outcomes. It also facilitates the design of observational studies to mimic a prospective design.

Methods

This study used linked administrative data from ICES to create a cohort of 137,035 individuals who received at least one prescription of methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 2014 and 2022. Data were linked using de-identified personal health numbers. Variables included age, sex, rurality, income, homelessness, and mental health conditions. Regional differences in OAT use, retention, and mortality were analyzed.

Results

Of the cohort, 56.1% began OAT after 2014. Southern Ontario participants more often started on methadone (53.2%), while Northern Ontario patients favored buprenorphine/naloxone (62.7%). Northern patients were younger, more likely to be female, live in rural areas, and face homelessness. The death rate was higher in Southern Ontario (22.1%) than in Northern Ontario (13.2%). Retention declined over time, with 73.4% of patients remaining in treatment at the study's end.

Conclusions

The findings highlight regional disparities in OAT delivery and emphasize the need for region-specific strategies, particularly in rural areas, to improve retention and reduce mortality.

队列简介:加拿大安大略省的省级阿片类激动剂治疗队列
阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)是阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)最有效的干预措施,但由于芬太尼等强效药物的增加,保留率下降。该队列可用于回顾性观察服务利用、医疗保健整合、医疗保健成本和患者结果的趋势。它还促进了观察性研究的设计,以模仿前瞻性设计。方法:本研究使用来自ICES的相关管理数据,创建了一个137035人的队列,这些人在2014年至2022年期间至少接受过一次美沙酮或丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮处方。数据通过去识别的个人健康号码连接起来。变量包括年龄、性别、农村、收入、无家可归和心理健康状况。分析了OAT使用、保留和死亡率的地区差异。结果该队列中,56.1%在2014年后开始OAT治疗。安大略省南部的参与者更常开始使用美沙酮(53.2%),而安大略省北部的患者更喜欢丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(62.7%)。北方的病人更年轻,更有可能是女性,生活在农村地区,面临无家可归。南安大略省的死亡率(22.1%)高于北安大略省(13.2%)。保留率随着时间的推移而下降,研究结束时,73.4%的患者仍在接受治疗。研究结果突出了OAT提供的地区差异,并强调需要制定针对地区的战略,特别是在农村地区,以提高保留率和降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Epidemiology
European Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信