Clinical Care Pathways for Second and Third Trimester Termination of Pregnancy for Medical Reasons in Canada

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Elise Lavoie-Lebel MD, MSc , Madeleine Ennis PhD , Regina Renner MD, MPH , Sarah Munro PhD , Robin Leung RN , Jennifer Chisholm PhD , Brigid Dineley MD, MHSc , Liv Knutzen MD , Julie Robertson MD , Jessica Liauw MD, MHSc
{"title":"Clinical Care Pathways for Second and Third Trimester Termination of Pregnancy for Medical Reasons in Canada","authors":"Elise Lavoie-Lebel MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Madeleine Ennis PhD ,&nbsp;Regina Renner MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Sarah Munro PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Leung RN ,&nbsp;Jennifer Chisholm PhD ,&nbsp;Brigid Dineley MD, MHSc ,&nbsp;Liv Knutzen MD ,&nbsp;Julie Robertson MD ,&nbsp;Jessica Liauw MD, MHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Termination of pregnancy in the second/third trimester for fetal or maternal complications (i.e., for medical reasons) is an essential health service. We aimed to describe the systems-level pathways for this care in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with maternal–fetal medicine (MFM), medical genetics, and nursing/social work clinicians at the 10 academic MFM sites in Canada. We conducted qualitative content analysis to identify categories describing the clinical care pathway. We triangulated data from participants within sites and then compared data across sites to describe similarities and differences in care. We used NVivo14 software for coding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We recruited 28 participants representing all sites: 10 MFM specialists, 9 medical geneticists/genetic counsellors, and 9 nurses/social workers. We identified 4 main categories describing the clinical care pathway: (1) initial visit and clinic structure, (2) offering termination, (3) provision of procedural and medication termination, and (4) post-termination care. Across sites, although clinic structure and post-termination care were similar, there were differences in offering the option of termination (e.g., variable indications qualifying for approval) and variations in details regarding the provision of procedural and medical termination (e.g., upper gestational age limits for procedural vs. medical approaches).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clinical care pathways for second/third trimester termination for medical reasons are variable across Canadian academic MFM centres, especially regarding circumstances under which termination is offered and details regarding the provision of procedural and medical termination. These differences provide opportunities to inform efforts to optimize equitable and comprehensive services in Canada.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 102770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216325000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Termination of pregnancy in the second/third trimester for fetal or maternal complications (i.e., for medical reasons) is an essential health service. We aimed to describe the systems-level pathways for this care in Canada.

Methods

We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with maternal–fetal medicine (MFM), medical genetics, and nursing/social work clinicians at the 10 academic MFM sites in Canada. We conducted qualitative content analysis to identify categories describing the clinical care pathway. We triangulated data from participants within sites and then compared data across sites to describe similarities and differences in care. We used NVivo14 software for coding.

Results

We recruited 28 participants representing all sites: 10 MFM specialists, 9 medical geneticists/genetic counsellors, and 9 nurses/social workers. We identified 4 main categories describing the clinical care pathway: (1) initial visit and clinic structure, (2) offering termination, (3) provision of procedural and medication termination, and (4) post-termination care. Across sites, although clinic structure and post-termination care were similar, there were differences in offering the option of termination (e.g., variable indications qualifying for approval) and variations in details regarding the provision of procedural and medical termination (e.g., upper gestational age limits for procedural vs. medical approaches).

Conclusions

Clinical care pathways for second/third trimester termination for medical reasons are variable across Canadian academic MFM centres, especially regarding circumstances under which termination is offered and details regarding the provision of procedural and medical termination. These differences provide opportunities to inform efforts to optimize equitable and comprehensive services in Canada.
加拿大因医学原因终止妊娠的中期和晚期临床护理途径。
目的:因胎儿或母体并发症(即医学原因)在妊娠2 /3个月终止妊娠是一项基本的卫生服务。我们的目的是描述加拿大这种护理的系统级途径。方法:我们对加拿大10个MFM学术站点的母胎医学(MFM)、医学遗传学和护理/社会工作临床医生进行了一对一的半结构化访谈。我们进行了定性内容分析,以确定描述临床护理途径的类别。我们对来自不同地点的参与者的数据进行三角测量,然后比较不同地点的数据,以描述护理方面的异同。我们使用NVivo14软件进行编码。结果:我们招募了28名代表所有地点的参与者——10名MFM专家,9名医学遗传学家/遗传咨询师,9名护士/社会工作者。我们确定了描述临床护理途径的4个主要类别:(1)初次就诊和诊所结构,(2)提供终止治疗,(3)提供程序和药物终止治疗,以及(4)终止治疗后护理。在各个地点,虽然诊所结构和终止妊娠后护理相似,但在提供终止妊娠选择方面存在差异(例如,有资格获得批准的各种适应症),在提供程序终止妊娠和医疗终止妊娠的细节方面也存在差异(例如,程序终止妊娠和医疗终止妊娠的最高胎龄限制)。结论:加拿大各学术MFM中心因医学原因终止妊娠第二/第三孕期的临床护理途径各不相同,特别是在提供终止妊娠的情况下以及提供程序终止妊娠和医疗终止妊娠的细节方面。这些差异为优化加拿大公平和全面的服务提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信