Kevin F Boehnke, Gabrielle Bowyer, Jenna McAfee, Tristin Smith, Catherine Klida, Vivian Kurtz, Evangelos Litinas, Poonam Purohit, Anne Arewasikporn, Dana Horowitz, Laura Thomas, Jennifer Eckersley, Mia Railing, David A Williams, Daniel J Clauw, Kelley M Kidwell, Amy S B Bohnert, Rachel S Bergmans
{"title":"Feasibility pilot of a novel coaching intervention to optimize cannabis use for chronic pain management among Veterans.","authors":"Kevin F Boehnke, Gabrielle Bowyer, Jenna McAfee, Tristin Smith, Catherine Klida, Vivian Kurtz, Evangelos Litinas, Poonam Purohit, Anne Arewasikporn, Dana Horowitz, Laura Thomas, Jennifer Eckersley, Mia Railing, David A Williams, Daniel J Clauw, Kelley M Kidwell, Amy S B Bohnert, Rachel S Bergmans","doi":"10.1186/s42238-025-00265-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pain is common among Veterans, some of whom use cannabis for pain. We conducted a feasibility pilot study of a novel coaching intervention to help Veterans optimize use of medical cannabis products for pain management (NCT06320470).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention drew from scientific literature, consultation with cannabis experts, Veteran input via a Community Advisory Board, and tenets of motivational interviewing. Participants were Veterans with chronic pain who endorsed current use or interest in using cannabis for pain management. Participants received up to 4 individual coaching sessions via videoconference, spaced approximately 2 weeks apart. We assessed feasibility (adherence, satisfaction, acceptability) and preliminary effects on pain symptoms 14 weeks after baseline. The primary outcome was the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and exploratory outcomes included domains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 22 enrolled participants, 17 attended 4 coaching sessions, 2 attended 3 sessions, and 2 attended 2 sessions. Among those who completed end of intervention surveys (16/21), 87.5% were very or completely satisfied with the intervention and 81.3% rated coaching as very or extremely helpful. All participants reported improvement on the PGIC, with 63% reporting much or very much improvement. Participants reported statistically significant decreased pain intensity (7.1/10 vs. 5.7/10) and pain interference (T-score 66.3 vs. 61.8), and increased social satisfaction (T-score 41.4 vs. 44.3). Participants noted helpful intervention factors, including co-developing a personalized plan, discussing questions/concerns, and trying different approaches to cannabis-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this feasibility pilot study of coaching on cannabis use for chronic pain among Veterans, participants were satisfied with the intervention and reported clinically significant improvements in pain symptoms. Our results support evaluating this intervention in a larger, efficacy trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"7 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00265-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic pain is common among Veterans, some of whom use cannabis for pain. We conducted a feasibility pilot study of a novel coaching intervention to help Veterans optimize use of medical cannabis products for pain management (NCT06320470).
Methods: The intervention drew from scientific literature, consultation with cannabis experts, Veteran input via a Community Advisory Board, and tenets of motivational interviewing. Participants were Veterans with chronic pain who endorsed current use or interest in using cannabis for pain management. Participants received up to 4 individual coaching sessions via videoconference, spaced approximately 2 weeks apart. We assessed feasibility (adherence, satisfaction, acceptability) and preliminary effects on pain symptoms 14 weeks after baseline. The primary outcome was the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and exploratory outcomes included domains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29.
Results: Of 22 enrolled participants, 17 attended 4 coaching sessions, 2 attended 3 sessions, and 2 attended 2 sessions. Among those who completed end of intervention surveys (16/21), 87.5% were very or completely satisfied with the intervention and 81.3% rated coaching as very or extremely helpful. All participants reported improvement on the PGIC, with 63% reporting much or very much improvement. Participants reported statistically significant decreased pain intensity (7.1/10 vs. 5.7/10) and pain interference (T-score 66.3 vs. 61.8), and increased social satisfaction (T-score 41.4 vs. 44.3). Participants noted helpful intervention factors, including co-developing a personalized plan, discussing questions/concerns, and trying different approaches to cannabis-based treatment.
Conclusions: In this feasibility pilot study of coaching on cannabis use for chronic pain among Veterans, participants were satisfied with the intervention and reported clinically significant improvements in pain symptoms. Our results support evaluating this intervention in a larger, efficacy trial.
慢性疼痛在退伍军人中很常见,其中一些人使用大麻来缓解疼痛。我们进行了一项新的指导干预的可行性试点研究,以帮助退伍军人优化使用医用大麻产品进行疼痛管理(NCT06320470)。方法:干预措施从科学文献、咨询大麻专家、退伍军人通过社区咨询委员会的意见和动机性访谈的原则中提取。参与者是患有慢性疼痛的退伍军人,他们支持目前使用大麻或对使用大麻进行疼痛管理感兴趣。参与者通过视频会议接受多达4次个人指导课程,间隔约2周。我们在基线后14周评估可行性(依从性、满意度、可接受性)和对疼痛症状的初步影响。主要结果是患者对变化的总体印象(PGIC),探索性结果包括患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)-29的领域。结果:在22名入组参与者中,17人参加了4次辅导,2人参加了3次辅导,2人参加了2次辅导。在完成干预结束调查(16/21)的人中,87.5%的人对干预非常满意或完全满意,81.3%的人认为教练非常或非常有帮助。所有参与者都报告了PGIC的改善,63%的人报告了很大或非常大的改善。参与者报告疼痛强度(7.1/10 vs. 5.7/10)和疼痛干扰(t -评分66.3 vs. 61.8)降低,社会满意度(t -评分41.4 vs. 44.3)增加。参与者注意到有益的干预因素,包括共同制定个性化计划,讨论问题/关注点,以及尝试不同的大麻治疗方法。结论:在这项对退伍军人慢性疼痛进行大麻使用指导的可行性试点研究中,参与者对干预感到满意,并报告了疼痛症状的临床显着改善。我们的结果支持在更大的有效性试验中评估这种干预措施。