Comparison of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in women of reproductive age with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2): A prospective observational study in China

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cheng Li, Xuanhui Wang, Qiulin Cui, Mian He, Ming Chen
{"title":"Comparison of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in women of reproductive age with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2): A prospective observational study in China","authors":"Cheng Li,&nbsp;Xuanhui Wang,&nbsp;Qiulin Cui,&nbsp;Mian He,&nbsp;Ming Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Non-invasive treatments, such as 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT), has gained increasing attention among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) who have fertility requirements. To compare the effectiveness of 5-ALA-PDT and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with CIN2, we conducted this prospective cohort study in Chinese patients with CIN2.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>229 patients with CIN2 were enrolled. They were divided into the PDT Group (n=94) and LEEP Group (n=135) according to the patient's willingness. Patients were evaluated at the 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-month follow-up periods, using cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy examination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the 3-month follow-up, the rates of disease regression to normal or CIN1 in the PDT group were 76.6% (72/94) and 13.8% (13/94), respectively, whereas in the LEEP group, they were 80.7% (109/135) and 11.1% (15/135), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the transformation zone type 3 was the only risk factor for both the PDT (OR=3.68; 95% CI, 2.43-5.26; P=0.008) and LEEP groups (OR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.84-4.53; P=0.02). The treatment efficacy in the PDT group increased gradually and peaked at the 18-month follow-up point with disease disappearance and regression rates of 90.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The disease disappearance and regression rates in the LEEP group were highest at the first half year posttreatment, with disease disappearance and regression rates of 87.4% and 12.6%, respectively. The hrHPV-negative rates in the PDT group and LEEP group were the highest at the 18-month follow-up (78.7% and 74.8%). There was no significant difference in the disappearance or regression rates between the two groups at the follow-up points (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study revealed that both 5-ALA PDT therapy and LEEP were highly effective at treating CIN2. 5-ALA-PDT, as a non-invasive treatment, could be an effective option for CIN2 patients with fertility preservation needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 104496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025000262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-invasive treatments, such as 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT), has gained increasing attention among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) who have fertility requirements. To compare the effectiveness of 5-ALA-PDT and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with CIN2, we conducted this prospective cohort study in Chinese patients with CIN2.

Methods

229 patients with CIN2 were enrolled. They were divided into the PDT Group (n=94) and LEEP Group (n=135) according to the patient's willingness. Patients were evaluated at the 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-month follow-up periods, using cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy examination.

Results

At the 3-month follow-up, the rates of disease regression to normal or CIN1 in the PDT group were 76.6% (72/94) and 13.8% (13/94), respectively, whereas in the LEEP group, they were 80.7% (109/135) and 11.1% (15/135), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the transformation zone type 3 was the only risk factor for both the PDT (OR=3.68; 95% CI, 2.43-5.26; P=0.008) and LEEP groups (OR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.84-4.53; P=0.02). The treatment efficacy in the PDT group increased gradually and peaked at the 18-month follow-up point with disease disappearance and regression rates of 90.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The disease disappearance and regression rates in the LEEP group were highest at the first half year posttreatment, with disease disappearance and regression rates of 87.4% and 12.6%, respectively. The hrHPV-negative rates in the PDT group and LEEP group were the highest at the 18-month follow-up (78.7% and 74.8%). There was no significant difference in the disappearance or regression rates between the two groups at the follow-up points (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study revealed that both 5-ALA PDT therapy and LEEP were highly effective at treating CIN2. 5-ALA-PDT, as a non-invasive treatment, could be an effective option for CIN2 patients with fertility preservation needs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信