[Sexuality of the couple during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study.]

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marine Beaumont, Mikael Agopiantz, Jeannine Ohl, Marie-Laure Eszto, Cedric Baumann, Matthieu Dap
{"title":"[Sexuality of the couple during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study.]","authors":"Marine Beaumont, Mikael Agopiantz, Jeannine Ohl, Marie-Laure Eszto, Cedric Baumann, Matthieu Dap","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the sexuality of pregnant women after Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective multicenter study based on two questionnaires: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Couple Satisfaction Index 32 (CSI 32). Two groups were compared: pregnancies following ART and spontaneous pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 women participated: 215 in the ART group and 186 in the spontaneous pregnancy group. Sexual dysfunction was observed in 49.8% of women in the ART group (n=108/215) and 44.1% in the spontaneous pregnancy group (n=82/186). The FSFI score was not significantly lower in the second trimester (24.0 ± 9.3 for ART vs 25.9 ± 7.3 for spontaneous pregnancy, p=0.07) but was significantly reduced across all trimesters (23.4 ± 9.2 vs 25.4 ± 5.8, p=0.02). Couple relationship quality (CSI 32) was similar between the two groups (134.4 ± 22.2 vs 133.9 ± 23.9, p=0.85). Only 13.9% of ART women (n=30/215) and 8.6% of spontaneous pregnancy women (n=16/186) had discussed their sexuality during pregnancy with a healthcare professional.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of sexual dysfunction during pregnancy is high, particularly among women followed for ART. However, the quality of the couple's relationship remains comparable between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2025.01.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the sexuality of pregnant women after Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART).

Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study based on two questionnaires: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Couple Satisfaction Index 32 (CSI 32). Two groups were compared: pregnancies following ART and spontaneous pregnancies.

Results: A total of 401 women participated: 215 in the ART group and 186 in the spontaneous pregnancy group. Sexual dysfunction was observed in 49.8% of women in the ART group (n=108/215) and 44.1% in the spontaneous pregnancy group (n=82/186). The FSFI score was not significantly lower in the second trimester (24.0 ± 9.3 for ART vs 25.9 ± 7.3 for spontaneous pregnancy, p=0.07) but was significantly reduced across all trimesters (23.4 ± 9.2 vs 25.4 ± 5.8, p=0.02). Couple relationship quality (CSI 32) was similar between the two groups (134.4 ± 22.2 vs 133.9 ± 23.9, p=0.85). Only 13.9% of ART women (n=30/215) and 8.6% of spontaneous pregnancy women (n=16/186) had discussed their sexuality during pregnancy with a healthcare professional.

Conclusion: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction during pregnancy is high, particularly among women followed for ART. However, the quality of the couple's relationship remains comparable between the two groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信