Subcutaneous route is a reliable alternative for ACTH-stimulated steroid profiling.

IF 3 3区医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM

Endocrine Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s12020-025-04172-4

Melkunte Shanthaiah Dhananjaya, Shashidhara Revanasiddappa, Nimmi Kansal, Anurag Ranjan Lila, Vijaya Sarathi

{"title":"Subcutaneous route is a reliable alternative for ACTH-stimulated steroid profiling.","authors":"Melkunte Shanthaiah Dhananjaya, Shashidhara Revanasiddappa, Nimmi Kansal, Anurag Ranjan Lila, Vijaya Sarathi","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04172-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Intramuscular acton prolongatum is most often used as an alternative for intramuscular or intravenous tetracosactide for ACTH stimulation in some countries. Intramuscular administration of acton prolongatum is cumbersome whereas intended intramuscular acton prolongatum or tetracosactide may often turn subcutaneous. Hence, we compared the subcutaneous ACTH-stimulated steroid profiling with those of the intramuscular routes.Methods: The study included 60 apparently-healthy adult females aged 18-40 years who were randomised to intramuscular tetracosactide (250 µg), intramuscular acton prolongatum (24 IU), subcutaneous tetracosactide (250 µg), and subcutaneous acton prolongatum (24 IU) groups in (1:1:1:1) ratio. Serum steroid profile consisting of 13 steroids was measured at baseline and 60 minutes after ACTH stimulation by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Results: Baseline steroid levels, stimulated steroid levels, and the percentage increase in all the steroids after subcutaneous tetracosactide and acton prolongatum stimulation were comparable to those after intramuscular tetracosactide and acton prolongatum stimulation, respectively.Conclusions: Intramuscular acton prolongatum, subcutaneous tetracosactide and subcutaneous acton prolongatum are simpler and reliable alternatives for ACTH-stimulated steroid profiling.","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04172-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intramuscular acton prolongatum is most often used as an alternative for intramuscular or intravenous tetracosactide for ACTH stimulation in some countries. Intramuscular administration of acton prolongatum is cumbersome whereas intended intramuscular acton prolongatum or tetracosactide may often turn subcutaneous. Hence, we compared the subcutaneous ACTH-stimulated steroid profiling with those of the intramuscular routes.

Methods: The study included 60 apparently-healthy adult females aged 18-40 years who were randomised to intramuscular tetracosactide (250 µg), intramuscular acton prolongatum (24 IU), subcutaneous tetracosactide (250 µg), and subcutaneous acton prolongatum (24 IU) groups in (1:1:1:1) ratio. Serum steroid profile consisting of 13 steroids was measured at baseline and 60 minutes after ACTH stimulation by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Results: Baseline steroid levels, stimulated steroid levels, and the percentage increase in all the steroids after subcutaneous tetracosactide and acton prolongatum stimulation were comparable to those after intramuscular tetracosactide and acton prolongatum stimulation, respectively.

Conclusions: Intramuscular acton prolongatum, subcutaneous tetracosactide and subcutaneous acton prolongatum are simpler and reliable alternatives for ACTH-stimulated steroid profiling.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

5.40%

发文量

295

审稿时长

1.5 months

期刊介绍： Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.