Should adrenal incidentaloma patients be evaluated for muscle mass, function, and quality? A cross-sectional study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Endocrine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1007/s12020-025-04170-6
Samet Alkan, Sedat Can Guney, Can Akcura, Nilufer Ozdemir, Zeliha Hekimsoy
{"title":"Should adrenal incidentaloma patients be evaluated for muscle mass, function, and quality? A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Samet Alkan, Sedat Can Guney, Can Akcura, Nilufer Ozdemir, Zeliha Hekimsoy","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04170-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study evaluated skeletal muscle mass, function and quality among mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) patients and non-functioning adrenal incidentaloma (NFAI) patients in comparison with the control group without adrenal mass.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 NFAI (49 female, 14 male) and 31 MACS (24 female, 7 male) patients were included in the study. As the control group, 44 patients (31 women, 13 men) who were known to have no radiological adrenal pathology on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging performed for other reasons were selected. After recording the laboratory parameters of the patients, anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength test with dynamometer, SARC-F survey and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurements were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference among the groups in terms of age, gender, and BMI parameters. Handgrip strength (HGS), skeletal muscle mass (SMM) index (SMM/BMI), and skeletal muscle quality (HGS/SMM), values used to evaluate muscle strength and quality, were found to be significantly lower in both the MACS and NFAI groups compared to the control group (p = 0.004, p = 0.012 and p = 0.034 respectively). This significance was also present in women subgroup analyses (p = 0.002, p = 0.037 and p = 0.039 respectively), but these parameters lost their statistical significance in men. In the correlation analysis of the female subgroup, 24-h free urine cortisol value was inversely proportional to skeletal muscle quality (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.417, p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that there is a decrease in muscle mass and function in female AI patients, and this decrease is more severe in MACS patients. These results may suggest that mild cortisol excess also has negative effects on skeletal muscle metabolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":"616-626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04170-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study evaluated skeletal muscle mass, function and quality among mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) patients and non-functioning adrenal incidentaloma (NFAI) patients in comparison with the control group without adrenal mass.

Methods: 63 NFAI (49 female, 14 male) and 31 MACS (24 female, 7 male) patients were included in the study. As the control group, 44 patients (31 women, 13 men) who were known to have no radiological adrenal pathology on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging performed for other reasons were selected. After recording the laboratory parameters of the patients, anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength test with dynamometer, SARC-F survey and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurements were performed.

Results: There was no statistical difference among the groups in terms of age, gender, and BMI parameters. Handgrip strength (HGS), skeletal muscle mass (SMM) index (SMM/BMI), and skeletal muscle quality (HGS/SMM), values used to evaluate muscle strength and quality, were found to be significantly lower in both the MACS and NFAI groups compared to the control group (p = 0.004, p = 0.012 and p = 0.034 respectively). This significance was also present in women subgroup analyses (p = 0.002, p = 0.037 and p = 0.039 respectively), but these parameters lost their statistical significance in men. In the correlation analysis of the female subgroup, 24-h free urine cortisol value was inversely proportional to skeletal muscle quality (rs = -0.417, p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Our study showed that there is a decrease in muscle mass and function in female AI patients, and this decrease is more severe in MACS patients. These results may suggest that mild cortisol excess also has negative effects on skeletal muscle metabolism.

肾上腺偶发瘤患者是否应该评估肌肉质量、功能和质量?横断面研究。
目的:本研究评估轻度自主皮质醇分泌(MACS)患者和无功能肾上腺偶发瘤(NFAI)患者的骨骼肌质量、功能和质量,并与无肾上腺肿块的对照组进行比较。方法:纳入63例NFAI患者(女性49例,男性14例)和31例MACS患者(女性24例,男性7例)。作为对照组,选择44例患者(31名女性,13名男性),这些患者在计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像中因其他原因未发现肾上腺影像学病变。记录患者的实验室参数后,进行人体测量、握力仪握力测试、SARC-F调查和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)测量。结果:两组患者年龄、性别、BMI指标差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,MACS组和NFAI组的握力(HGS)、骨骼肌质量(SMM/BMI)指数(SMM/BMI)和骨骼肌质量(HGS/SMM)(用于评估肌肉力量和质量的值)均显著降低(p = 0.004、p = 0.012和p = 0.034)。在女性亚组分析中也存在这种显著性(分别为p = 0.002, p = 0.037和p = 0.039),但这些参数在男性中没有统计学意义。在女性亚组的相关分析中,24小时游离尿皮质醇值与骨骼肌质量成反比(rs = -0.417, p = 0.008)。结论:我们的研究表明,女性AI患者存在肌肉质量和功能的下降,且这种下降在MACS患者中更为严重。这些结果可能表明轻度皮质醇过量也对骨骼肌代谢有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信