Assessing the capacity to implement the international health regulations to control COVID-19 at points of entry in Eswatini.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hloniphile H Masuku, Song-Lih Huang
{"title":"Assessing the capacity to implement the international health regulations to control COVID-19 at points of entry in Eswatini.","authors":"Hloniphile H Masuku, Song-Lih Huang","doi":"10.3855/jidc.20325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Significant challenges to implementing international health regulations (IHR) at points of entry (PoEs) have been highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Better assessment of the capacities of the PoEs may promote focused interventions. This study aimed to assess the capacities and practices at PoEs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A self-filled questionnaire based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint External Evaluation Tool was distributed to frontline workers at four major PoEs. A total of 368 questionnaires were distributed and 308 were completed. Online interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 16). The capacity of PoE was scored by referencing the WHO checklist for core capacity requirement, and categorized into limited, partial, or full capacity. Pearson's Chi square test was used to compare differences among PoEs. Qualitative data was thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the 308 participants in the survey were from Ngwenya (59.4%). Approximately 68% were government employees, and 81% had more than 2 years of experience. Participants reported shortage of resources, such as medical facility (30.5%), staff (37.7%), gloves (47.7%), masks (48.4%), and isolation room; and inconsistencies in practices such as record keeping, reporting cases, and quarantine measures. The overall capacity for IHR implementation was limited, with the airport PoE showing partial capacity and the three ground PoEs having limited capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The capacity to implement the IHR at Eswatini PoEs was limited. The results suggest the need to allocate resources to PoEs and to enhance training on practices regarding case handling, reporting, and record keeping.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"18 12.1","pages":"S227-S238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Significant challenges to implementing international health regulations (IHR) at points of entry (PoEs) have been highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Better assessment of the capacities of the PoEs may promote focused interventions. This study aimed to assess the capacities and practices at PoEs.

Methodology: A self-filled questionnaire based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint External Evaluation Tool was distributed to frontline workers at four major PoEs. A total of 368 questionnaires were distributed and 308 were completed. Online interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 16). The capacity of PoE was scored by referencing the WHO checklist for core capacity requirement, and categorized into limited, partial, or full capacity. Pearson's Chi square test was used to compare differences among PoEs. Qualitative data was thematically analyzed.

Results: The majority of the 308 participants in the survey were from Ngwenya (59.4%). Approximately 68% were government employees, and 81% had more than 2 years of experience. Participants reported shortage of resources, such as medical facility (30.5%), staff (37.7%), gloves (47.7%), masks (48.4%), and isolation room; and inconsistencies in practices such as record keeping, reporting cases, and quarantine measures. The overall capacity for IHR implementation was limited, with the airport PoE showing partial capacity and the three ground PoEs having limited capacity.

Conclusions: The capacity to implement the IHR at Eswatini PoEs was limited. The results suggest the need to allocate resources to PoEs and to enhance training on practices regarding case handling, reporting, and record keeping.

导言:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行凸显了在入境点(PoEs)执行国际卫生条例(IHR)所面临的重大挑战。更好地评估入境点(PoEs)的能力可促进有针对性的干预措施。本研究旨在评估入境点的能力和做法:根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的联合外部评估工具,向四个主要PoE的一线工作人员发放了一份自我填写的调查问卷。共发放问卷 368 份,完成 308 份。对主要信息提供者(n = 16)进行了在线访谈。参照世界卫生组织的核心能力要求清单,对 PoE 的能力进行评分,并将其分为有限能力、部分能力和完全能力。采用皮尔逊卡方检验比较 PoE 之间的差异。对定性数据进行了专题分析:在参与调查的 308 人中,大多数来自恩圭尼亚(59.4%)。约 68% 的人是政府雇员,81% 的人有两年以上的工作经验。参与者报告了资源短缺的情况,如医疗设施(30.5%)、工作人员(37.7%)、手套(47.7%)、口罩(48.4%)和隔离室;以及记录保存、病例报告和隔离措施等做法不一致的情况。实施《国际卫生条例》的总体能力有限,机场工作点显示出部分能力,三个地面工作点的能力有限:结论:在埃斯瓦提尼的服务点实施《国际卫生条例》的能力有限。结果表明,有必要向 PoE 分配资源,并加强有关案件处理、报告和记录保存做法的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信