Preferences for breast cancer screening: Results of a discrete choice experiment.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Na Xiao, Menghao Yang, Lingli Zhang, Ruixia Wang, Jing Chen
{"title":"Preferences for breast cancer screening: Results of a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Na Xiao, Menghao Yang, Lingli Zhang, Ruixia Wang, Jing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the preferences of breast cancer patients in China for screening services using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and latent class modeling (LCM). The findings are intended to inform the development of more patient-centered screening programs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional, hospital-based survey employing discrete choice experiment methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 278 breast cancer patients were recruited from the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery at a tertiary hospital in Guizhou Province. The study evaluated key attributes of screening services, including screening frequency, medical staff experience, referral sources, and out-of-pocket costs, through a DCE questionnaire. A mixed logit model was applied to assess overall patient preferences, while LCM was used to explore heterogeneity among patient subgroups. The development of the DCE questionnaire involved focus group discussions to ensure the relevance of attributes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that screening frequency, medical staff experience, and out-of-pocket costs were the most significant factors influencing patient preferences. Patients exhibited a strong preference for annual screenings (β = -1.622, p < 0.001) and for screening by experienced medical staff (β = 2.216, p < 0.001). Additionally, lower out-of-pocket costs significantly enhanced willingness to participate (β = -0.211, p < 0.05). LCM analysis identified two distinct patient subgroups: \"process-driven\" patients, who prioritized lower costs and multi-channel referral options, and \"efficiency-driven\" patients, who valued timely service and experienced staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the diverse preferences of breast cancer patients for screening services and suggests that personalized screening programs could better meet the needs of different patient subgroups. Developing flexible, patient-centered screening programs will be essential to improving participation and satisfaction with breast cancer screening in China. Practical challenges in implementing such personalized approaches should be considered in future policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the preferences of breast cancer patients in China for screening services using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and latent class modeling (LCM). The findings are intended to inform the development of more patient-centered screening programs.

Study design: A cross-sectional, hospital-based survey employing discrete choice experiment methodology.

Methods: A total of 278 breast cancer patients were recruited from the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery at a tertiary hospital in Guizhou Province. The study evaluated key attributes of screening services, including screening frequency, medical staff experience, referral sources, and out-of-pocket costs, through a DCE questionnaire. A mixed logit model was applied to assess overall patient preferences, while LCM was used to explore heterogeneity among patient subgroups. The development of the DCE questionnaire involved focus group discussions to ensure the relevance of attributes.

Results: The analysis revealed that screening frequency, medical staff experience, and out-of-pocket costs were the most significant factors influencing patient preferences. Patients exhibited a strong preference for annual screenings (β = -1.622, p < 0.001) and for screening by experienced medical staff (β = 2.216, p < 0.001). Additionally, lower out-of-pocket costs significantly enhanced willingness to participate (β = -0.211, p < 0.05). LCM analysis identified two distinct patient subgroups: "process-driven" patients, who prioritized lower costs and multi-channel referral options, and "efficiency-driven" patients, who valued timely service and experienced staff.

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the diverse preferences of breast cancer patients for screening services and suggests that personalized screening programs could better meet the needs of different patient subgroups. Developing flexible, patient-centered screening programs will be essential to improving participation and satisfaction with breast cancer screening in China. Practical challenges in implementing such personalized approaches should be considered in future policy development.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信