Motor Learning Deficits in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Maria Marlicz, Weronika Matysik, Emily Zucker, Sarah Lee, Hannah Mulhern, Jennifer Burnsed
{"title":"Motor Learning Deficits in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury.","authors":"Maria Marlicz, Weronika Matysik, Emily Zucker, Sarah Lee, Hannah Mulhern, Jennifer Burnsed","doi":"10.3390/children12010027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Motor deficits following neonatal brain injury, from cerebral palsy to subtle deficits in motor planning, are common yet underreported. Rodent models of motor deficits in neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) allow improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms and neuroprotective strategies. Our goal was to test motor performance and learning in a mouse model of neonatal HI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We induced HI in postnatal day (p)10 C57/Bl6 mice through unilateral carotid ligation followed by 60 min of 8% oxygen exposure, or a sham procedure. At p30, we assessed complex motor performance and learning using the accelerating rotarod and complex running wheel tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the rotarod task, HI mice performed worse than sham mice, with shorter latencies to fall (n = 6 sham, 9 HI; day 1, <i>p</i> = 0.033; day 2, <i>p</i> = 0.013; day 3, <i>p</i> = 0.023). Sham mice demonstrated improved performance across days (<i>p</i> = 0.005), and HI mice did not (<i>p</i> = 0.44). During the simple running wheel task, we observed no difference in wheel rotation and speed between groups (n = 5/group; day 1, <i>p</i> = 0.67; day 4, <i>p</i> = 0.53). However, when navigating a wheel with a random pattern of spokes removed (complex task), HI mice took longer than sham mice to reach a plateau in performance (n = 5/group; day 1, <i>p</i> = 0.02; day 4, <i>p</i> = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that young adult mice exposed to HI exhibit significant deficits and delayed learning in complex motor performance compared to sham mice. HI mice do not show deficits in gross motor performance; however, more subtle impairments are present in complex motor performance and learning. This HI model exhibits subtle motor deficits relevant to findings in humans and may be a useful tool in testing further neuroprotective strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Motor deficits following neonatal brain injury, from cerebral palsy to subtle deficits in motor planning, are common yet underreported. Rodent models of motor deficits in neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) allow improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms and neuroprotective strategies. Our goal was to test motor performance and learning in a mouse model of neonatal HI.

Methods: We induced HI in postnatal day (p)10 C57/Bl6 mice through unilateral carotid ligation followed by 60 min of 8% oxygen exposure, or a sham procedure. At p30, we assessed complex motor performance and learning using the accelerating rotarod and complex running wheel tasks.

Results: In the rotarod task, HI mice performed worse than sham mice, with shorter latencies to fall (n = 6 sham, 9 HI; day 1, p = 0.033; day 2, p = 0.013; day 3, p = 0.023). Sham mice demonstrated improved performance across days (p = 0.005), and HI mice did not (p = 0.44). During the simple running wheel task, we observed no difference in wheel rotation and speed between groups (n = 5/group; day 1, p = 0.67; day 4, p = 0.53). However, when navigating a wheel with a random pattern of spokes removed (complex task), HI mice took longer than sham mice to reach a plateau in performance (n = 5/group; day 1, p = 0.02; day 4, p = 0.77).

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that young adult mice exposed to HI exhibit significant deficits and delayed learning in complex motor performance compared to sham mice. HI mice do not show deficits in gross motor performance; however, more subtle impairments are present in complex motor performance and learning. This HI model exhibits subtle motor deficits relevant to findings in humans and may be a useful tool in testing further neuroprotective strategies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信