Hyun Cha Ji, Hong Choi Ki, Chul-Min Ahn, Yu Cheol Woong, Hyun Park Ik, Woo Jin Jang, Hyun-Joong Kim, Jang-Whan Bae, Sung Uk Kwon, Hyun-Jong Lee, Wang Soo Lee, Jin-Ok Jeong, Sang-Don Park, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Jeong Hoon Yang
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score.","authors":"Hyun Cha Ji, Hong Choi Ki, Chul-Min Ahn, Yu Cheol Woong, Hyun Park Ik, Woo Jin Jang, Hyun-Joong Kim, Jang-Whan Bae, Sung Uk Kwon, Hyun-Jong Lee, Wang Soo Lee, Jin-Ok Jeong, Sang-Don Park, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Jeong Hoon Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS patients, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT02985008.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.
Methods: Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.
Results: The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).
Conclusions: Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS patients, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice.